Cargando…

Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020

IMPORTANCE: Increasingly, cost-effectiveness analyses are being done to determine the value of rapidly increasing oncology drugs; however, this assumes that these analyses are unbiased. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of cost-effectiveness studies and to determine characteristics associate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haslam, Alyson, Lythgoe, Mark P., Greenstreet Akman, Emma, Prasad, Vinay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35123
_version_ 1784601700080812032
author Haslam, Alyson
Lythgoe, Mark P.
Greenstreet Akman, Emma
Prasad, Vinay
author_facet Haslam, Alyson
Lythgoe, Mark P.
Greenstreet Akman, Emma
Prasad, Vinay
author_sort Haslam, Alyson
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Increasingly, cost-effectiveness analyses are being done to determine the value of rapidly increasing oncology drugs; however, this assumes that these analyses are unbiased. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of cost-effectiveness studies and to determine characteristics associated with whether an oncology drug is found to be cost-effective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 254 cost-effectiveness analyses for 116 oncology drugs that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2020. EXPOSURES: Each drug was analyzed for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year, the funding of the study, the authors’ conflict of interest, the threshold of willingness-to-pay, from what country’s perspective the analysis was done, and whether a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness analysis had been done. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the odds of a study concluding that a drug was cost-effective. RESULTS: There were 116 drug approvals with 254 studies and country perspectives. Of the country perspectives, 132 (52%) were from the US. Forty-seven of 78 drugs with cost-effective studies had been shown to improve overall survival, whereas 15 of 38 of drugs without a cost-effectiveness study had been shown to improve overall survival. Having a study funded by a pharmaceutical company was associated with higher odds of a study concluding that a drug was cost-effective than studies without funding (odds ratio, 41.36; 95% CI, 11.86-262.23). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, pharmaceutical funding was associated with greater odds that an oncology drug would be found to be cost-effective. These findings suggest that simply disclosing potential conflict of interest is inadequate. We encourage cost-effectiveness analyses by independent groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8603079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86030792021-12-02 Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020 Haslam, Alyson Lythgoe, Mark P. Greenstreet Akman, Emma Prasad, Vinay JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Increasingly, cost-effectiveness analyses are being done to determine the value of rapidly increasing oncology drugs; however, this assumes that these analyses are unbiased. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of cost-effectiveness studies and to determine characteristics associated with whether an oncology drug is found to be cost-effective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 254 cost-effectiveness analyses for 116 oncology drugs that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2020. EXPOSURES: Each drug was analyzed for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year, the funding of the study, the authors’ conflict of interest, the threshold of willingness-to-pay, from what country’s perspective the analysis was done, and whether a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness analysis had been done. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the odds of a study concluding that a drug was cost-effective. RESULTS: There were 116 drug approvals with 254 studies and country perspectives. Of the country perspectives, 132 (52%) were from the US. Forty-seven of 78 drugs with cost-effective studies had been shown to improve overall survival, whereas 15 of 38 of drugs without a cost-effectiveness study had been shown to improve overall survival. Having a study funded by a pharmaceutical company was associated with higher odds of a study concluding that a drug was cost-effective than studies without funding (odds ratio, 41.36; 95% CI, 11.86-262.23). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, pharmaceutical funding was associated with greater odds that an oncology drug would be found to be cost-effective. These findings suggest that simply disclosing potential conflict of interest is inadequate. We encourage cost-effectiveness analyses by independent groups. American Medical Association 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8603079/ /pubmed/34792592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35123 Text en Copyright 2021 Haslam A et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Haslam, Alyson
Lythgoe, Mark P.
Greenstreet Akman, Emma
Prasad, Vinay
Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title_full Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title_fullStr Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title_short Characteristics of Cost-effectiveness Studies for Oncology Drugs Approved in the United States From 2015-2020
title_sort characteristics of cost-effectiveness studies for oncology drugs approved in the united states from 2015-2020
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35123
work_keys_str_mv AT haslamalyson characteristicsofcosteffectivenessstudiesforoncologydrugsapprovedintheunitedstatesfrom20152020
AT lythgoemarkp characteristicsofcosteffectivenessstudiesforoncologydrugsapprovedintheunitedstatesfrom20152020
AT greenstreetakmanemma characteristicsofcosteffectivenessstudiesforoncologydrugsapprovedintheunitedstatesfrom20152020
AT prasadvinay characteristicsofcosteffectivenessstudiesforoncologydrugsapprovedintheunitedstatesfrom20152020