Cargando…

Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits

Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Athar, Fontanari, Vigilio, Schmoelz, Werner, Agrawal, Sunil K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257
_version_ 1784601707322277888
author Ali, Athar
Fontanari, Vigilio
Schmoelz, Werner
Agrawal, Sunil K.
author_facet Ali, Athar
Fontanari, Vigilio
Schmoelz, Werner
Agrawal, Sunil K.
author_sort Ali, Athar
collection PubMed
description Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on the back support exoskeletons by discussing their type (Active/Passive), structure (Rigid/Soft), power transmission methods, weight, maximum assistive force, battery technologies, tasks (lifting, bending, stooping work), kinematic compatibility and other important features. This article also assesses the back support exoskeletons in terms of their ability to reduce the physical load on the spine. By reviewing functional and structural characteristics, the goal is to increase communication and realization among ergonomics practitioners, developers, customers, and factory workers. The search resulted in reviewing 34 exoskeletons of which 16 were passive and 18 were active. In conclusion, back support exoskeletons have immense potential to significantly reduce the factors regarding work-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, various technical challenges and a lack of established safety standards limit the wide adaptation of exoskeletons in industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8603112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86031122021-11-20 Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits Ali, Athar Fontanari, Vigilio Schmoelz, Werner Agrawal, Sunil K. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on the back support exoskeletons by discussing their type (Active/Passive), structure (Rigid/Soft), power transmission methods, weight, maximum assistive force, battery technologies, tasks (lifting, bending, stooping work), kinematic compatibility and other important features. This article also assesses the back support exoskeletons in terms of their ability to reduce the physical load on the spine. By reviewing functional and structural characteristics, the goal is to increase communication and realization among ergonomics practitioners, developers, customers, and factory workers. The search resulted in reviewing 34 exoskeletons of which 16 were passive and 18 were active. In conclusion, back support exoskeletons have immense potential to significantly reduce the factors regarding work-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, various technical challenges and a lack of established safety standards limit the wide adaptation of exoskeletons in industry. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8603112/ /pubmed/34805118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ali, Fontanari, Schmoelz and Agrawal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Ali, Athar
Fontanari, Vigilio
Schmoelz, Werner
Agrawal, Sunil K.
Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title_full Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title_short Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
title_sort systematic review of back-support exoskeletons and soft robotic suits
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257
work_keys_str_mv AT aliathar systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits
AT fontanarivigilio systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits
AT schmoelzwerner systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits
AT agrawalsunilk systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits