Cargando…
Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits
Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257 |
_version_ | 1784601707322277888 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Athar Fontanari, Vigilio Schmoelz, Werner Agrawal, Sunil K. |
author_facet | Ali, Athar Fontanari, Vigilio Schmoelz, Werner Agrawal, Sunil K. |
author_sort | Ali, Athar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on the back support exoskeletons by discussing their type (Active/Passive), structure (Rigid/Soft), power transmission methods, weight, maximum assistive force, battery technologies, tasks (lifting, bending, stooping work), kinematic compatibility and other important features. This article also assesses the back support exoskeletons in terms of their ability to reduce the physical load on the spine. By reviewing functional and structural characteristics, the goal is to increase communication and realization among ergonomics practitioners, developers, customers, and factory workers. The search resulted in reviewing 34 exoskeletons of which 16 were passive and 18 were active. In conclusion, back support exoskeletons have immense potential to significantly reduce the factors regarding work-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, various technical challenges and a lack of established safety standards limit the wide adaptation of exoskeletons in industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8603112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86031122021-11-20 Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits Ali, Athar Fontanari, Vigilio Schmoelz, Werner Agrawal, Sunil K. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Lower back pain and musculoskeletal injuries are serious concerns for workers subjected to physical workload and manual material handling tasks. Spine assistive exoskeletons are being developed to support the spine and distribute the spine load. This article presents a detailed up-to-date review on the back support exoskeletons by discussing their type (Active/Passive), structure (Rigid/Soft), power transmission methods, weight, maximum assistive force, battery technologies, tasks (lifting, bending, stooping work), kinematic compatibility and other important features. This article also assesses the back support exoskeletons in terms of their ability to reduce the physical load on the spine. By reviewing functional and structural characteristics, the goal is to increase communication and realization among ergonomics practitioners, developers, customers, and factory workers. The search resulted in reviewing 34 exoskeletons of which 16 were passive and 18 were active. In conclusion, back support exoskeletons have immense potential to significantly reduce the factors regarding work-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, various technical challenges and a lack of established safety standards limit the wide adaptation of exoskeletons in industry. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8603112/ /pubmed/34805118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ali, Fontanari, Schmoelz and Agrawal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Ali, Athar Fontanari, Vigilio Schmoelz, Werner Agrawal, Sunil K. Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title | Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title_full | Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title_short | Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits |
title_sort | systematic review of back-support exoskeletons and soft robotic suits |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.765257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aliathar systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits AT fontanarivigilio systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits AT schmoelzwerner systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits AT agrawalsunilk systematicreviewofbacksupportexoskeletonsandsoftroboticsuits |