Cargando…
Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079 |
_version_ | 1784601708860538880 |
---|---|
author | Bailey, Timothy S. Evenou, Pierre Gill, Jasvinder Berhanu, Paulos Raymond, Romain Strong, Jodi Wright, Eugene E. |
author_facet | Bailey, Timothy S. Evenou, Pierre Gill, Jasvinder Berhanu, Paulos Raymond, Romain Strong, Jodi Wright, Eugene E. |
author_sort | Bailey, Timothy S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy. METHODS: Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.52) or severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8603128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86031282021-12-02 Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study Bailey, Timothy S. Evenou, Pierre Gill, Jasvinder Berhanu, Paulos Raymond, Romain Strong, Jodi Wright, Eugene E. Diabetes Spectr Feature Articles BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy. METHODS: Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.52) or severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300. American Diabetes Association 2021-11 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8603128/ /pubmed/34866875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license. |
spellingShingle | Feature Articles Bailey, Timothy S. Evenou, Pierre Gill, Jasvinder Berhanu, Paulos Raymond, Romain Strong, Jodi Wright, Eugene E. Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title | Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title_full | Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title_fullStr | Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title_short | Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study |
title_sort | post hoc analysis evaluating the impact of antihyperglycemic background therapies on attainment of a1c targets without hypoglycemia in the achieve control pragmatic, real-life study |
topic | Feature Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baileytimothys posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT evenoupierre posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT gilljasvinder posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT berhanupaulos posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT raymondromain posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT strongjodi posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy AT wrighteugenee posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy |