Cargando…

Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study

BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Timothy S., Evenou, Pierre, Gill, Jasvinder, Berhanu, Paulos, Raymond, Romain, Strong, Jodi, Wright, Eugene E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866875
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079
_version_ 1784601708860538880
author Bailey, Timothy S.
Evenou, Pierre
Gill, Jasvinder
Berhanu, Paulos
Raymond, Romain
Strong, Jodi
Wright, Eugene E.
author_facet Bailey, Timothy S.
Evenou, Pierre
Gill, Jasvinder
Berhanu, Paulos
Raymond, Romain
Strong, Jodi
Wright, Eugene E.
author_sort Bailey, Timothy S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy. METHODS: Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.52) or severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8603128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86031282021-12-02 Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study Bailey, Timothy S. Evenou, Pierre Gill, Jasvinder Berhanu, Paulos Raymond, Romain Strong, Jodi Wright, Eugene E. Diabetes Spectr Feature Articles BACKGROUND: ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0–11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy. METHODS: Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.52) or severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300. American Diabetes Association 2021-11 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8603128/ /pubmed/34866875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Bailey, Timothy S.
Evenou, Pierre
Gill, Jasvinder
Berhanu, Paulos
Raymond, Romain
Strong, Jodi
Wright, Eugene E.
Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title_full Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title_fullStr Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title_full_unstemmed Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title_short Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study
title_sort post hoc analysis evaluating the impact of antihyperglycemic background therapies on attainment of a1c targets without hypoglycemia in the achieve control pragmatic, real-life study
topic Feature Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866875
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0079
work_keys_str_mv AT baileytimothys posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT evenoupierre posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT gilljasvinder posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT berhanupaulos posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT raymondromain posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT strongjodi posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy
AT wrighteugenee posthocanalysisevaluatingtheimpactofantihyperglycemicbackgroundtherapiesonattainmentofa1ctargetswithouthypoglycemiaintheachievecontrolpragmaticreallifestudy