Cargando…

State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care

BACKGROUND: Care for people with an Intellectual Disability (ID) is complex: multiple health care professionals are involved and use different Health Information Systems (HISs) to store medical and daily care information on the same individuals. The objective of this study is to identify the HISs ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tummers, Joep, Tobi, Hilde, Schalk, Bianca, Tekinerdogan, Bedir, Leusink, Geraline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34794424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9
_version_ 1784601779994886144
author Tummers, Joep
Tobi, Hilde
Schalk, Bianca
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
Leusink, Geraline
author_facet Tummers, Joep
Tobi, Hilde
Schalk, Bianca
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
Leusink, Geraline
author_sort Tummers, Joep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Care for people with an Intellectual Disability (ID) is complex: multiple health care professionals are involved and use different Health Information Systems (HISs) to store medical and daily care information on the same individuals. The objective of this study is to identify the HISs needs of professionals in ID care by addressing the obstacles and challenges they meet in their current HISs. METHODS: We distributed an online questionnaire amongst Dutch ID care professionals via different professional associations and care providers. 328 respondents answered questions on their HISs. An inventory was made of HIS usage purposes, problems, satisfaction and desired features, with and without stratification on type of HIS and care professional. RESULTS: Typical in ID care, two types of HISs are being used that differ with respect to their features and users: Electronic Client Dossiers (ECDs) and Electronic Patient Dossiers (EPDs). In total, the respondents mentioned 52 unique HISs. Groups of care professionals differed in their satisfaction with ECDs only. Both HIS types present users with difficulties related to the specifics of care for people with an ID. Particularly the much needed communication between the many unique HISs was reported a major issue which implies major issues with inter-operability. Other problems seem design-related as well. CONCLUSION: This study can be used to improve current HISs and design new HISs that take ID care professionals requirements into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8603513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86035132021-11-19 State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care Tummers, Joep Tobi, Hilde Schalk, Bianca Tekinerdogan, Bedir Leusink, Geraline BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Care for people with an Intellectual Disability (ID) is complex: multiple health care professionals are involved and use different Health Information Systems (HISs) to store medical and daily care information on the same individuals. The objective of this study is to identify the HISs needs of professionals in ID care by addressing the obstacles and challenges they meet in their current HISs. METHODS: We distributed an online questionnaire amongst Dutch ID care professionals via different professional associations and care providers. 328 respondents answered questions on their HISs. An inventory was made of HIS usage purposes, problems, satisfaction and desired features, with and without stratification on type of HIS and care professional. RESULTS: Typical in ID care, two types of HISs are being used that differ with respect to their features and users: Electronic Client Dossiers (ECDs) and Electronic Patient Dossiers (EPDs). In total, the respondents mentioned 52 unique HISs. Groups of care professionals differed in their satisfaction with ECDs only. Both HIS types present users with difficulties related to the specifics of care for people with an ID. Particularly the much needed communication between the many unique HISs was reported a major issue which implies major issues with inter-operability. Other problems seem design-related as well. CONCLUSION: This study can be used to improve current HISs and design new HISs that take ID care professionals requirements into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9. BioMed Central 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8603513/ /pubmed/34794424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tummers, Joep
Tobi, Hilde
Schalk, Bianca
Tekinerdogan, Bedir
Leusink, Geraline
State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title_full State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title_fullStr State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title_full_unstemmed State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title_short State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
title_sort state of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34794424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tummersjoep stateofthepracticeofhealthinformationsystemsasurveystudyamongsthealthcareprofessionalsinintellectualdisabilitycare
AT tobihilde stateofthepracticeofhealthinformationsystemsasurveystudyamongsthealthcareprofessionalsinintellectualdisabilitycare
AT schalkbianca stateofthepracticeofhealthinformationsystemsasurveystudyamongsthealthcareprofessionalsinintellectualdisabilitycare
AT tekinerdoganbedir stateofthepracticeofhealthinformationsystemsasurveystudyamongsthealthcareprofessionalsinintellectualdisabilitycare
AT leusinkgeraline stateofthepracticeofhealthinformationsystemsasurveystudyamongsthealthcareprofessionalsinintellectualdisabilitycare