Cargando…

Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial

Personal genomic educational testing (PGET) has been suggested as a strategy to improve student learning for pharmacogenomics (PGx), but no randomized studies have evaluated PGET’s educational benefit. We investigated the effect of PGET on student knowledge, comfort, and attitudes related to PGx in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grace, Chloe, Larriva, Marti M., Steiner, Heidi E., Marupuru, Srujitha, Campbell, Patrick J., Patterson, Hayley, Cropp, Cheryl D., Quinn, Dorothy, Klimecki, Walter, Nix, David E., Warholak, Terri, Karnes, Jason H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13121
_version_ 1784601913783746560
author Grace, Chloe
Larriva, Marti M.
Steiner, Heidi E.
Marupuru, Srujitha
Campbell, Patrick J.
Patterson, Hayley
Cropp, Cheryl D.
Quinn, Dorothy
Klimecki, Walter
Nix, David E.
Warholak, Terri
Karnes, Jason H.
author_facet Grace, Chloe
Larriva, Marti M.
Steiner, Heidi E.
Marupuru, Srujitha
Campbell, Patrick J.
Patterson, Hayley
Cropp, Cheryl D.
Quinn, Dorothy
Klimecki, Walter
Nix, David E.
Warholak, Terri
Karnes, Jason H.
author_sort Grace, Chloe
collection PubMed
description Personal genomic educational testing (PGET) has been suggested as a strategy to improve student learning for pharmacogenomics (PGx), but no randomized studies have evaluated PGET’s educational benefit. We investigated the effect of PGET on student knowledge, comfort, and attitudes related to PGx in a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial. Consenting participants were randomized to receive PGET or no PGET (NPGET) during 4 subsequent years of a PGx course. All participants completed a pre‐survey and post‐survey designed to assess (1) PGx knowledge, (2) comfort with PGx patient education and clinical skills, and (3) attitudes toward PGx. Instructors were blinded to PGET assignment. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare pre‐survey and post‐survey PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed between PGET (n = 117) and NPGET (n = 116) participants. Among all participants, significant improvement was observed in PGx knowledge (mean 57% vs. 39% correct responses; p < 0.001) with similar results for student comfort and attitudes. Change in pre/post‐PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes were not significantly different between PGET and NPGET groups (mean 19.5% vs. 16.7% knowledge improvement, respectively; p = 0.41). Similar results were observed for PGET participants carrying a highly actionable PGx variant versus PGET participants without an actionable variant. Significant improvement in Likert scale responses were observed in PGET versus NPGET for questions that assessed student engagement (p = 0.020) and reinforcement of course concepts (p = 0.006). Although some evidence of improved engagement and participation was observed, the results of this study suggest that PGET does not directly improve student PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86042262021-11-24 Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial Grace, Chloe Larriva, Marti M. Steiner, Heidi E. Marupuru, Srujitha Campbell, Patrick J. Patterson, Hayley Cropp, Cheryl D. Quinn, Dorothy Klimecki, Walter Nix, David E. Warholak, Terri Karnes, Jason H. Clin Transl Sci Research Personal genomic educational testing (PGET) has been suggested as a strategy to improve student learning for pharmacogenomics (PGx), but no randomized studies have evaluated PGET’s educational benefit. We investigated the effect of PGET on student knowledge, comfort, and attitudes related to PGx in a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial. Consenting participants were randomized to receive PGET or no PGET (NPGET) during 4 subsequent years of a PGx course. All participants completed a pre‐survey and post‐survey designed to assess (1) PGx knowledge, (2) comfort with PGx patient education and clinical skills, and (3) attitudes toward PGx. Instructors were blinded to PGET assignment. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare pre‐survey and post‐survey PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed between PGET (n = 117) and NPGET (n = 116) participants. Among all participants, significant improvement was observed in PGx knowledge (mean 57% vs. 39% correct responses; p < 0.001) with similar results for student comfort and attitudes. Change in pre/post‐PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes were not significantly different between PGET and NPGET groups (mean 19.5% vs. 16.7% knowledge improvement, respectively; p = 0.41). Similar results were observed for PGET participants carrying a highly actionable PGx variant versus PGET participants without an actionable variant. Significant improvement in Likert scale responses were observed in PGET versus NPGET for questions that assessed student engagement (p = 0.020) and reinforcement of course concepts (p = 0.006). Although some evidence of improved engagement and participation was observed, the results of this study suggest that PGET does not directly improve student PGx knowledge, comfort, and attitudes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-25 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8604226/ /pubmed/34431601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13121 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Grace, Chloe
Larriva, Marti M.
Steiner, Heidi E.
Marupuru, Srujitha
Campbell, Patrick J.
Patterson, Hayley
Cropp, Cheryl D.
Quinn, Dorothy
Klimecki, Walter
Nix, David E.
Warholak, Terri
Karnes, Jason H.
Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13121
work_keys_str_mv AT gracechloe efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT larrivamartim efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steinerheidie efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marupurusrujitha efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellpatrickj efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pattersonhayley efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT croppcheryld efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quinndorothy efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klimeckiwalter efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nixdavide efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT warholakterri efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karnesjasonh efficacyofpersonalpharmacogenomictestingasaneducationaltoolinthepharmacycurriculumanonblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial