Cargando…

How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Primary care is typically the first point of contact in the health care system for people raising concerns about their memory. However, there is still a lack of high-quality evidence and understanding about how primary care professionals (PCPs) currently manage people at higher risk of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallam, Brendan, Rees, Jessica, Petersen, Irene, Cooper, Claudia, Avgerinou, Christina, Walters, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab014
_version_ 1784601922232123392
author Hallam, Brendan
Rees, Jessica
Petersen, Irene
Cooper, Claudia
Avgerinou, Christina
Walters, Kate
author_facet Hallam, Brendan
Rees, Jessica
Petersen, Irene
Cooper, Claudia
Avgerinou, Christina
Walters, Kate
author_sort Hallam, Brendan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care is typically the first point of contact in the health care system for people raising concerns about their memory. However, there is still a lack of high-quality evidence and understanding about how primary care professionals (PCPs) currently manage people at higher risk of developing dementia. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review management strategies provided by PCPs to reduce cognitive decline in people with mild cognitive impairment and subjective memory complaints. METHOD: A systematic search for studies was conducted in December 2019 across five databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science). Methodological quality of included studies was independently assessed by two authors using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: An initial 11 719 were found, 7250 were screened and 9 studies were included in the review. Most studies were self-reported behaviour surveys. For non-pharmacological strategies, the most frequent advice PCPs provided was to increase physical activity, cognitive stimulation, diet and social stimulation. For pharmacological strategies, PCPs would most frequently not prescribe any treatment. If PCPs did prescribe, the most frequent prescriptions targeted vascular risk factors to reduce the risk of further cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: PCPs reported that they are much more likely to provide non-pharmacological strategies than pharmacological strategies in line with guidelines on preventing the onset of dementia. However, the quality of evidence within the included studies is low and relies on subjective self-reported behaviours. Observational research is needed to provide an accurate reflection of how people with memory problems are managed in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86042772021-11-22 How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review Hallam, Brendan Rees, Jessica Petersen, Irene Cooper, Claudia Avgerinou, Christina Walters, Kate Fam Pract Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Primary care is typically the first point of contact in the health care system for people raising concerns about their memory. However, there is still a lack of high-quality evidence and understanding about how primary care professionals (PCPs) currently manage people at higher risk of developing dementia. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review management strategies provided by PCPs to reduce cognitive decline in people with mild cognitive impairment and subjective memory complaints. METHOD: A systematic search for studies was conducted in December 2019 across five databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science). Methodological quality of included studies was independently assessed by two authors using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: An initial 11 719 were found, 7250 were screened and 9 studies were included in the review. Most studies were self-reported behaviour surveys. For non-pharmacological strategies, the most frequent advice PCPs provided was to increase physical activity, cognitive stimulation, diet and social stimulation. For pharmacological strategies, PCPs would most frequently not prescribe any treatment. If PCPs did prescribe, the most frequent prescriptions targeted vascular risk factors to reduce the risk of further cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: PCPs reported that they are much more likely to provide non-pharmacological strategies than pharmacological strategies in line with guidelines on preventing the onset of dementia. However, the quality of evidence within the included studies is low and relies on subjective self-reported behaviours. Observational research is needed to provide an accurate reflection of how people with memory problems are managed in primary care. Oxford University Press 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8604277/ /pubmed/33907811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab014 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Hallam, Brendan
Rees, Jessica
Petersen, Irene
Cooper, Claudia
Avgerinou, Christina
Walters, Kate
How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title_full How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title_fullStr How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title_short How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review
title_sort how are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab014
work_keys_str_mv AT hallambrendan howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT reesjessica howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT petersenirene howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT cooperclaudia howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT avgerinouchristina howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT walterskate howarepeoplewithmildcognitiveimpairmentorsubjectivememorycomplaintsmanagedinprimarycareasystematicreview