Cargando…

Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?

Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helbing, Dirk, Beschorner, Thomas, Frey, Bruno, Diekmann, Andreas, Hagendorff, Thilo, Seele, Peter, Spiekermann-Hoff, Sarah, van den Hoven, Jeroen, Zwitter, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1989243
_version_ 1784601971750076416
author Helbing, Dirk
Beschorner, Thomas
Frey, Bruno
Diekmann, Andreas
Hagendorff, Thilo
Seele, Peter
Spiekermann-Hoff, Sarah
van den Hoven, Jeroen
Zwitter, Andrej
author_facet Helbing, Dirk
Beschorner, Thomas
Frey, Bruno
Diekmann, Andreas
Hagendorff, Thilo
Seele, Peter
Spiekermann-Hoff, Sarah
van den Hoven, Jeroen
Zwitter, Andrej
author_sort Helbing, Dirk
collection PubMed
description Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the health system, too. It can support accurate diagnoses, better treatments and greater cost effectiveness. However, it can also have undesirable implications, often in the sense of undesired side effects, which may in fact be terrible. Examples for this, as discussed in this article, are discrimination, the mechanisation of death, and genetic, social, behavioural or technological selection, which may imply eugenic effects or social Darwinism. As many unintended effects become visible only after years, we still lack sufficient criteria, long-term experience and advanced methods to reliably exclude that things may go terribly wrong. Handing over decision-making, responsibility or control to machines, could be dangerous and irresponsible. It would also be in serious conflict with human rights and our constitution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86044832021-11-20 Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution? Helbing, Dirk Beschorner, Thomas Frey, Bruno Diekmann, Andreas Hagendorff, Thilo Seele, Peter Spiekermann-Hoff, Sarah van den Hoven, Jeroen Zwitter, Andrej J Eur CME Position Paper Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the health system, too. It can support accurate diagnoses, better treatments and greater cost effectiveness. However, it can also have undesirable implications, often in the sense of undesired side effects, which may in fact be terrible. Examples for this, as discussed in this article, are discrimination, the mechanisation of death, and genetic, social, behavioural or technological selection, which may imply eugenic effects or social Darwinism. As many unintended effects become visible only after years, we still lack sufficient criteria, long-term experience and advanced methods to reliably exclude that things may go terribly wrong. Handing over decision-making, responsibility or control to machines, could be dangerous and irresponsible. It would also be in serious conflict with human rights and our constitution. Taylor & Francis 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8604483/ /pubmed/34804636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1989243 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Position Paper
Helbing, Dirk
Beschorner, Thomas
Frey, Bruno
Diekmann, Andreas
Hagendorff, Thilo
Seele, Peter
Spiekermann-Hoff, Sarah
van den Hoven, Jeroen
Zwitter, Andrej
Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_full Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_fullStr Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_full_unstemmed Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_short Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_sort triage 4.0: on death algorithms and technological selection. is today’s data- driven medical system still compatible with the constitution?
topic Position Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1989243
work_keys_str_mv AT helbingdirk triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT beschornerthomas triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT freybruno triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT diekmannandreas triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT hagendorffthilo triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT seelepeter triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT spiekermannhoffsarah triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT vandenhovenjeroen triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
AT zwitterandrej triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution