Cargando…

Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations

BACKGROUND: Postural control is critical for body sway control and is subserved by three sources of sensory feedback (ie, vision, proprioception and vestibulation). A method for determining the relative contribution of each sensory feedback source to postural control is the modified clinical test of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goble, Daniel J, Conner, Nathan O, Nolff, Michael R, Haworth, Joshua L, Kendall, Bradley J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815720
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S339187
_version_ 1784602006892052480
author Goble, Daniel J
Conner, Nathan O
Nolff, Michael R
Haworth, Joshua L
Kendall, Bradley J
author_facet Goble, Daniel J
Conner, Nathan O
Nolff, Michael R
Haworth, Joshua L
Kendall, Bradley J
author_sort Goble, Daniel J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postural control is critical for body sway control and is subserved by three sources of sensory feedback (ie, vision, proprioception and vestibulation). A method for determining the relative contribution of each sensory feedback source to postural control is the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance for the balance tracking system (BTrackS). However, this method has not yet been evaluated for test–retest reliability. PURPOSE: To determine the test–retest reliability of the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol for the BTrackS across multiple time intervals. METHODS: Three groups of healthy young adults performed the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol four times separated by either one day, one week or one month. Within each time duration group, and condition, differences in total center of pressure path length were determined from one test session to the next and intra class correlation coefficient categorizations were made. RESULTS: In all but one case, no significant difference in performance was seen from one testing session to the next. The one significant difference found was a decrease in total center of pressure path length from day 1 to day 2 in the vestibular condition of the group tested daily. Intra class correlation coefficient results largely indicated fair-good reliability across time durations and test conditions. CONCLUSION: The present study largely supports use of the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol as a means of probing the sensory contributions to balance performance across multiple time durations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86046512021-11-22 Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations Goble, Daniel J Conner, Nathan O Nolff, Michael R Haworth, Joshua L Kendall, Bradley J Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: Postural control is critical for body sway control and is subserved by three sources of sensory feedback (ie, vision, proprioception and vestibulation). A method for determining the relative contribution of each sensory feedback source to postural control is the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance for the balance tracking system (BTrackS). However, this method has not yet been evaluated for test–retest reliability. PURPOSE: To determine the test–retest reliability of the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol for the BTrackS across multiple time intervals. METHODS: Three groups of healthy young adults performed the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol four times separated by either one day, one week or one month. Within each time duration group, and condition, differences in total center of pressure path length were determined from one test session to the next and intra class correlation coefficient categorizations were made. RESULTS: In all but one case, no significant difference in performance was seen from one testing session to the next. The one significant difference found was a decrease in total center of pressure path length from day 1 to day 2 in the vestibular condition of the group tested daily. Intra class correlation coefficient results largely indicated fair-good reliability across time durations and test conditions. CONCLUSION: The present study largely supports use of the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol as a means of probing the sensory contributions to balance performance across multiple time durations. Dove 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8604651/ /pubmed/34815720 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S339187 Text en © 2021 Goble et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Goble, Daniel J
Conner, Nathan O
Nolff, Michael R
Haworth, Joshua L
Kendall, Bradley J
Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title_full Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title_fullStr Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title_short Test–Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations
title_sort test–retest reliability of the balance tracking system modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol across multiple time durations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815720
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S339187
work_keys_str_mv AT gobledanielj testretestreliabilityofthebalancetrackingsystemmodifiedclinicaltestofsensoryintegrationandbalanceprotocolacrossmultipletimedurations
AT connernathano testretestreliabilityofthebalancetrackingsystemmodifiedclinicaltestofsensoryintegrationandbalanceprotocolacrossmultipletimedurations
AT nolffmichaelr testretestreliabilityofthebalancetrackingsystemmodifiedclinicaltestofsensoryintegrationandbalanceprotocolacrossmultipletimedurations
AT haworthjoshual testretestreliabilityofthebalancetrackingsystemmodifiedclinicaltestofsensoryintegrationandbalanceprotocolacrossmultipletimedurations
AT kendallbradleyj testretestreliabilityofthebalancetrackingsystemmodifiedclinicaltestofsensoryintegrationandbalanceprotocolacrossmultipletimedurations