Cargando…

Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature

Multiplexed respiratory viral panels (MRVP) have recently been added to the diagnostic work-up of respiratory infections. This review provides a summary of the main literature of MRVP for patients with regard to 3 different topics. Can the results of MRVP reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wils, Jense, Saegeman, Veroniek, Schuermans, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34799754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04375-3
_version_ 1784602018271199232
author Wils, Jense
Saegeman, Veroniek
Schuermans, Annette
author_facet Wils, Jense
Saegeman, Veroniek
Schuermans, Annette
author_sort Wils, Jense
collection PubMed
description Multiplexed respiratory viral panels (MRVP) have recently been added to the diagnostic work-up of respiratory infections. This review provides a summary of the main literature of MRVP for patients with regard to 3 different topics. Can the results of MRVP reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics, can they guide the use of appropriate antiviral therapy and do they have an added value with respect to infection control measures? Literature was searched for based on a defined search string using both the PubMed and Embase database. Twenty-five articles report on the impact of MRVP on antibiotic therapy. In all the articles where active antimicrobial stewardship was performed (e.g., education/advice on interpreting results of MRVP) (N = 9), a reduction in antibiotic therapy was shown (with exception of 2 studies). Three studies evaluating the effect of MRVP on antimicrobial use in a population that is not suspected of having bacterial pneumonia (e.g., absence of radiology suggestive for bacterial infection or low PCT) found a positive impact on antibiotic therapy. Eight studies with a short TAT (< 7 h) had a positive impact on use of antibiotic therapy. Eleven studies focused on the impact of MRVP on antiviral use. In contrast to antibiotic reduction, all studies systematically objectified improved antiviral use as a consequence of MRVP results. With regard to the impact of MRVP on infection control, eleven articles were withheld. All these studies led to a more accurate use of infection control measures by detecting unidentified pathogens or stopping isolation precautions in case of a negative MRVP result. MRVP don’t reduce antibiotic therapy in all populations. Reduction seems more likely if the following factors are present: active antimicrobial stewardship, low likelihood of a bacterial infection, and a short turnaround time to result. With respect to antiviral therapy, all studies have an impact but the targeted use of antivirals is so far not that evidence based for all viral respiratory pathogens. Regarding infection control measures, the potential impact of MRVP is high because of the need of additional isolation precautions for many respiratory viruses, although logistical problems can occur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86046992021-11-22 Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature Wils, Jense Saegeman, Veroniek Schuermans, Annette Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Review Multiplexed respiratory viral panels (MRVP) have recently been added to the diagnostic work-up of respiratory infections. This review provides a summary of the main literature of MRVP for patients with regard to 3 different topics. Can the results of MRVP reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics, can they guide the use of appropriate antiviral therapy and do they have an added value with respect to infection control measures? Literature was searched for based on a defined search string using both the PubMed and Embase database. Twenty-five articles report on the impact of MRVP on antibiotic therapy. In all the articles where active antimicrobial stewardship was performed (e.g., education/advice on interpreting results of MRVP) (N = 9), a reduction in antibiotic therapy was shown (with exception of 2 studies). Three studies evaluating the effect of MRVP on antimicrobial use in a population that is not suspected of having bacterial pneumonia (e.g., absence of radiology suggestive for bacterial infection or low PCT) found a positive impact on antibiotic therapy. Eight studies with a short TAT (< 7 h) had a positive impact on use of antibiotic therapy. Eleven studies focused on the impact of MRVP on antiviral use. In contrast to antibiotic reduction, all studies systematically objectified improved antiviral use as a consequence of MRVP results. With regard to the impact of MRVP on infection control, eleven articles were withheld. All these studies led to a more accurate use of infection control measures by detecting unidentified pathogens or stopping isolation precautions in case of a negative MRVP result. MRVP don’t reduce antibiotic therapy in all populations. Reduction seems more likely if the following factors are present: active antimicrobial stewardship, low likelihood of a bacterial infection, and a short turnaround time to result. With respect to antiviral therapy, all studies have an impact but the targeted use of antivirals is so far not that evidence based for all viral respiratory pathogens. Regarding infection control measures, the potential impact of MRVP is high because of the need of additional isolation precautions for many respiratory viruses, although logistical problems can occur. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8604699/ /pubmed/34799754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04375-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review
Wils, Jense
Saegeman, Veroniek
Schuermans, Annette
Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title_full Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title_short Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
title_sort impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34799754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04375-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsjense impactofmultiplexedrespiratoryviralpanelsoninfectioncontrolmeasuresandantimicrobialstewardshipareviewoftheliterature
AT saegemanveroniek impactofmultiplexedrespiratoryviralpanelsoninfectioncontrolmeasuresandantimicrobialstewardshipareviewoftheliterature
AT schuermansannette impactofmultiplexedrespiratoryviralpanelsoninfectioncontrolmeasuresandantimicrobialstewardshipareviewoftheliterature