Cargando…

Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a more sensitive prognostic factor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in various cardiac diseases. Little is known about the clinical impact of GLS changes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study aimed to explore if non-improvement o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otterstad, Jan Erik, Norum, Ingvild Billehaug, Ruddox, Vidar, Le, An Chau Maria, Bendz, Bjørn, Munkhaugen, John, Klungsøyr, Ole, Edvardsen, Thor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2
_version_ 1784602046102503424
author Otterstad, Jan Erik
Norum, Ingvild Billehaug
Ruddox, Vidar
Le, An Chau Maria
Bendz, Bjørn
Munkhaugen, John
Klungsøyr, Ole
Edvardsen, Thor
author_facet Otterstad, Jan Erik
Norum, Ingvild Billehaug
Ruddox, Vidar
Le, An Chau Maria
Bendz, Bjørn
Munkhaugen, John
Klungsøyr, Ole
Edvardsen, Thor
author_sort Otterstad, Jan Erik
collection PubMed
description Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a more sensitive prognostic factor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in various cardiac diseases. Little is known about the clinical impact of GLS changes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study aimed to explore if non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was associated with higher risk of subsequent composite cardiovascular events (CCVE). Patients with AMI were consecutively included at a secondary care center in Norway between April 2016 and July 2018 within 4 days following percutaneous coronary intervention. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 3 months. Patients were categorized with non-improvement (0 to − 100%) or improvement (0 to 100%) in GLS relative to the baseline value. Among 214 patients with mean age 65 (± 10) years and mean LVEF 50% (± 8) at baseline, 50 (23%) had non-improvement (GLS: − 16.0% (± 3.7) to − 14.2% (± 3.6)) and 164 (77%) had improvement (GLS: − 14.0% (± 3.0) to − 16.9% (± 3.0%)). During a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (95% CI 3.2 to 3.4) 77 CCVE occurred in 52 patients. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, baseline GLS was associated with all recurrent CCVE (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p < 0.001) whereas non-improvement versus improvement over 3 months follow-up was not. Baseline GLS was significantly associated with the number of CCVE in revascularized AMI patients whereas non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was not. Further large-scale studies are needed before repeated GLS measurements may be recommended in clinical practice. Trial registration: Current Research information system in Norway (CRISTIN). Id: 506563 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86048502021-12-03 Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction Otterstad, Jan Erik Norum, Ingvild Billehaug Ruddox, Vidar Le, An Chau Maria Bendz, Bjørn Munkhaugen, John Klungsøyr, Ole Edvardsen, Thor Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a more sensitive prognostic factor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in various cardiac diseases. Little is known about the clinical impact of GLS changes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study aimed to explore if non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was associated with higher risk of subsequent composite cardiovascular events (CCVE). Patients with AMI were consecutively included at a secondary care center in Norway between April 2016 and July 2018 within 4 days following percutaneous coronary intervention. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 3 months. Patients were categorized with non-improvement (0 to − 100%) or improvement (0 to 100%) in GLS relative to the baseline value. Among 214 patients with mean age 65 (± 10) years and mean LVEF 50% (± 8) at baseline, 50 (23%) had non-improvement (GLS: − 16.0% (± 3.7) to − 14.2% (± 3.6)) and 164 (77%) had improvement (GLS: − 14.0% (± 3.0) to − 16.9% (± 3.0%)). During a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (95% CI 3.2 to 3.4) 77 CCVE occurred in 52 patients. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, baseline GLS was associated with all recurrent CCVE (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p < 0.001) whereas non-improvement versus improvement over 3 months follow-up was not. Baseline GLS was significantly associated with the number of CCVE in revascularized AMI patients whereas non-improvement of GLS after 3 months was not. Further large-scale studies are needed before repeated GLS measurements may be recommended in clinical practice. Trial registration: Current Research information system in Norway (CRISTIN). Id: 506563 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2. Springer Netherlands 2021-07-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8604850/ /pubmed/34327649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Otterstad, Jan Erik
Norum, Ingvild Billehaug
Ruddox, Vidar
Le, An Chau Maria
Bendz, Bjørn
Munkhaugen, John
Klungsøyr, Ole
Edvardsen, Thor
Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title_full Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title_short Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
title_sort prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2
work_keys_str_mv AT otterstadjanerik prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT norumingvildbillehaug prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT ruddoxvidar prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT leanchaumaria prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT bendzbjørn prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT munkhaugenjohn prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT klungsøyrole prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction
AT edvardsenthor prognosticimpactofnonimprovementofgloballongitudinalstraininpatientswithrevascularizedacutemyocardialinfarction