Cargando…

Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis

Objective measures of sexual interest are important for research on human sexuality. There has been a resurgence in research examining pupil dilation as a potential index of sexual orientation. We carried out a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1965 and 2020 (Mdn year = 2016) measuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attard-Johnson, Janice, Vasilev, Martin R., Ó Ciardha, Caoilte, Bindemann, Markus, Babchishin, Kelly M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02137-y
_version_ 1784602048668368896
author Attard-Johnson, Janice
Vasilev, Martin R.
Ó Ciardha, Caoilte
Bindemann, Markus
Babchishin, Kelly M.
author_facet Attard-Johnson, Janice
Vasilev, Martin R.
Ó Ciardha, Caoilte
Bindemann, Markus
Babchishin, Kelly M.
author_sort Attard-Johnson, Janice
collection PubMed
description Objective measures of sexual interest are important for research on human sexuality. There has been a resurgence in research examining pupil dilation as a potential index of sexual orientation. We carried out a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1965 and 2020 (Mdn year = 2016) measuring pupil responses to visual stimuli of adult men and women to assess sexual interest. Separate meta-analyses were performed for six sexual orientation categories. In the final analysis, 15 studies were included for heterosexual men (N = 550), 5 studies for gay men (N = 65), 4 studies for bisexual men (N = 124), 13 studies for heterosexual women (N = 403), and 3 studies for lesbian women (N = 132). Only heterosexual and gay men demonstrated discrimination in pupillary responses that was clearly in line with their sexual orientation, with greater pupil dilation to female and male stimuli, respectively. Bisexual men showed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Although heterosexual women exhibited larger pupils to male stimuli compared to female stimuli, the magnitude of the effect was small and non-significant. Finally, lesbian women displayed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Three methodological moderators were identified—the sexual explicitness of stimulus materials, the measurement technique of pupillary response, and inclusion of self-report measures of sexual interest. These meta-analyses are based on a limited number of studies and are therefore preliminary. However, the results suggest that pupillary measurement of sexual interest is promising for men and that standardization is essential to gain a better understanding of the validity of this measurement technique for sexual interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10508-021-02137-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86048612021-12-03 Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis Attard-Johnson, Janice Vasilev, Martin R. Ó Ciardha, Caoilte Bindemann, Markus Babchishin, Kelly M. Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Objective measures of sexual interest are important for research on human sexuality. There has been a resurgence in research examining pupil dilation as a potential index of sexual orientation. We carried out a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1965 and 2020 (Mdn year = 2016) measuring pupil responses to visual stimuli of adult men and women to assess sexual interest. Separate meta-analyses were performed for six sexual orientation categories. In the final analysis, 15 studies were included for heterosexual men (N = 550), 5 studies for gay men (N = 65), 4 studies for bisexual men (N = 124), 13 studies for heterosexual women (N = 403), and 3 studies for lesbian women (N = 132). Only heterosexual and gay men demonstrated discrimination in pupillary responses that was clearly in line with their sexual orientation, with greater pupil dilation to female and male stimuli, respectively. Bisexual men showed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Although heterosexual women exhibited larger pupils to male stimuli compared to female stimuli, the magnitude of the effect was small and non-significant. Finally, lesbian women displayed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Three methodological moderators were identified—the sexual explicitness of stimulus materials, the measurement technique of pupillary response, and inclusion of self-report measures of sexual interest. These meta-analyses are based on a limited number of studies and are therefore preliminary. However, the results suggest that pupillary measurement of sexual interest is promising for men and that standardization is essential to gain a better understanding of the validity of this measurement technique for sexual interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10508-021-02137-y. Springer US 2021-09-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8604861/ /pubmed/34557971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02137-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Attard-Johnson, Janice
Vasilev, Martin R.
Ó Ciardha, Caoilte
Bindemann, Markus
Babchishin, Kelly M.
Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort measurement of sexual interests with pupillary responses: a meta-analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02137-y
work_keys_str_mv AT attardjohnsonjanice measurementofsexualinterestswithpupillaryresponsesametaanalysis
AT vasilevmartinr measurementofsexualinterestswithpupillaryresponsesametaanalysis
AT ociardhacaoilte measurementofsexualinterestswithpupillaryresponsesametaanalysis
AT bindemannmarkus measurementofsexualinterestswithpupillaryresponsesametaanalysis
AT babchishinkellym measurementofsexualinterestswithpupillaryresponsesametaanalysis