Cargando…
Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0 |
_version_ | 1784602053750816768 |
---|---|
author | De Paolis, Elisa Concolino, Paola Onori, Maria Elisabetta Santonocito, Concetta Marchetti, Claudia Fagotti, Anna Scambia, Giovanni Urbani, Andrea Minucci, Angelo |
author_facet | De Paolis, Elisa Concolino, Paola Onori, Maria Elisabetta Santonocito, Concetta Marchetti, Claudia Fagotti, Anna Scambia, Giovanni Urbani, Andrea Minucci, Angelo |
author_sort | De Paolis, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8604882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86048822021-12-03 Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation De Paolis, Elisa Concolino, Paola Onori, Maria Elisabetta Santonocito, Concetta Marchetti, Claudia Fagotti, Anna Scambia, Giovanni Urbani, Andrea Minucci, Angelo Mol Biol Rep Mini Review Article Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8604882/ /pubmed/34643925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mini Review Article De Paolis, Elisa Concolino, Paola Onori, Maria Elisabetta Santonocito, Concetta Marchetti, Claudia Fagotti, Anna Scambia, Giovanni Urbani, Andrea Minucci, Angelo Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title | Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title_full | Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title_fullStr | Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title_short | Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
title_sort | tumor brca testing in ovarian cancer and eqa scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation |
topic | Mini Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depaoliselisa tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT concolinopaola tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT onorimariaelisabetta tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT santonocitoconcetta tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT marchetticlaudia tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT fagottianna tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT scambiagiovanni tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT urbaniandrea tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation AT minucciangelo tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation |