Cargando…

Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Paolis, Elisa, Concolino, Paola, Onori, Maria Elisabetta, Santonocito, Concetta, Marchetti, Claudia, Fagotti, Anna, Scambia, Giovanni, Urbani, Andrea, Minucci, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0
_version_ 1784602053750816768
author De Paolis, Elisa
Concolino, Paola
Onori, Maria Elisabetta
Santonocito, Concetta
Marchetti, Claudia
Fagotti, Anna
Scambia, Giovanni
Urbani, Andrea
Minucci, Angelo
author_facet De Paolis, Elisa
Concolino, Paola
Onori, Maria Elisabetta
Santonocito, Concetta
Marchetti, Claudia
Fagotti, Anna
Scambia, Giovanni
Urbani, Andrea
Minucci, Angelo
author_sort De Paolis, Elisa
collection PubMed
description Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86048822021-12-03 Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation De Paolis, Elisa Concolino, Paola Onori, Maria Elisabetta Santonocito, Concetta Marchetti, Claudia Fagotti, Anna Scambia, Giovanni Urbani, Andrea Minucci, Angelo Mol Biol Rep Mini Review Article Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8604882/ /pubmed/34643925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mini Review Article
De Paolis, Elisa
Concolino, Paola
Onori, Maria Elisabetta
Santonocito, Concetta
Marchetti, Claudia
Fagotti, Anna
Scambia, Giovanni
Urbani, Andrea
Minucci, Angelo
Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title_full Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title_fullStr Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title_short Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
title_sort tumor brca testing in ovarian cancer and eqa scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation
topic Mini Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06812-0
work_keys_str_mv AT depaoliselisa tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT concolinopaola tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT onorimariaelisabetta tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT santonocitoconcetta tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT marchetticlaudia tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT fagottianna tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT scambiagiovanni tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT urbaniandrea tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation
AT minucciangelo tumorbrcatestinginovariancancerandeqaschemeourexperienceofacriticalevaluation