Cargando…

Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration

Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arikan, Belkis Ezgi, van Kemenade, Bianca M., Fiehler, Katja, Kircher, Tilo, Drewing, Knut, Straube, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34799622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5
_version_ 1784602058385522688
author Arikan, Belkis Ezgi
van Kemenade, Bianca M.
Fiehler, Katja
Kircher, Tilo
Drewing, Knut
Straube, Benjamin
author_facet Arikan, Belkis Ezgi
van Kemenade, Bianca M.
Fiehler, Katja
Kircher, Tilo
Drewing, Knut
Straube, Benjamin
author_sort Arikan, Belkis Ezgi
collection PubMed
description Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), which in turn influences adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events. In the adaptation phase of the experiment, action-feedback pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0 ms or 150 ms). In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether they detected a delay. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by the motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by the inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components contribute to recalibration in a modality-dependent manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86049022021-11-22 Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration Arikan, Belkis Ezgi van Kemenade, Bianca M. Fiehler, Katja Kircher, Tilo Drewing, Knut Straube, Benjamin Sci Rep Article Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), which in turn influences adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events. In the adaptation phase of the experiment, action-feedback pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0 ms or 150 ms). In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether they detected a delay. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by the motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by the inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components contribute to recalibration in a modality-dependent manner. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8604902/ /pubmed/34799622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Arikan, Belkis Ezgi
van Kemenade, Bianca M.
Fiehler, Katja
Kircher, Tilo
Drewing, Knut
Straube, Benjamin
Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_full Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_fullStr Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_full_unstemmed Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_short Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_sort different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34799622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5
work_keys_str_mv AT arikanbelkisezgi differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
AT vankemenadebiancam differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
AT fiehlerkatja differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
AT kirchertilo differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
AT drewingknut differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
AT straubebenjamin differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration