Cargando…

Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVES: To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction. METHODS: In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiu, E., Valls-Sole, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.002
_version_ 1784602079929565184
author Ruiu, E.
Valls-Sole, J.
author_facet Ruiu, E.
Valls-Sole, J.
author_sort Ruiu, E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction. METHODS: In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progressively increasing intensity and level of muscle contraction. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the silent period (SP) were compared to those obtained with plexus, midarm and wrist stimulation. Additionally, in a smaller number of subjects, we obtained the peristimulus time histogram (psth) of single motor unit firing in the FDI, examined the effects of vibration and recorded the modulation of sustained EMG activity in muscles of the lower limbs. RESULTS: Increasing CRMS intensity led to larger CMAP with no relevant changes in SP1 or SP2, except for lower amplitude of the burst interrupting the silent period (BISP). Increasing the level of muscle contraction led to reduced CMAP, shorter SP duration and increased BISP amplitude. The psth analysis showed the underlying changes in the motor unit firing frequency that corresponded to the changes seen in the CMAP and the SP with surface recordings. Progressively distal stimulation led to CMAPs of shorter latency and increased amplitude, SPs of longer latency and shorter duration, and a BISP of longer latency. Vibration led to reduction of the SP. CRMS induced SPs in muscles of the lower limb. CONCLUSIONS: CRMS induces excitatory and inhibitory responses in hand muscles, fitting with the expected behavior of mixed nerve stimulation at very proximal sites. SIGNIFICANCE: Characterization of the effects of CRMS on hand muscles is of physiological and potentially clinical applicability, as it is a painless and reliable procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8604992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86049922021-11-24 Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects Ruiu, E. Valls-Sole, J. Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction. METHODS: In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progressively increasing intensity and level of muscle contraction. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the silent period (SP) were compared to those obtained with plexus, midarm and wrist stimulation. Additionally, in a smaller number of subjects, we obtained the peristimulus time histogram (psth) of single motor unit firing in the FDI, examined the effects of vibration and recorded the modulation of sustained EMG activity in muscles of the lower limbs. RESULTS: Increasing CRMS intensity led to larger CMAP with no relevant changes in SP1 or SP2, except for lower amplitude of the burst interrupting the silent period (BISP). Increasing the level of muscle contraction led to reduced CMAP, shorter SP duration and increased BISP amplitude. The psth analysis showed the underlying changes in the motor unit firing frequency that corresponded to the changes seen in the CMAP and the SP with surface recordings. Progressively distal stimulation led to CMAPs of shorter latency and increased amplitude, SPs of longer latency and shorter duration, and a BISP of longer latency. Vibration led to reduction of the SP. CRMS induced SPs in muscles of the lower limb. CONCLUSIONS: CRMS induces excitatory and inhibitory responses in hand muscles, fitting with the expected behavior of mixed nerve stimulation at very proximal sites. SIGNIFICANCE: Characterization of the effects of CRMS on hand muscles is of physiological and potentially clinical applicability, as it is a painless and reliable procedure. Elsevier 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8604992/ /pubmed/34825114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.002 Text en © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ruiu, E.
Valls-Sole, J.
Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title_full Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title_fullStr Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title_short Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
title_sort excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.002
work_keys_str_mv AT ruiue excitatoryandinhibitoryresponsestocervicalrootmagneticstimulationinhealthysubjects
AT vallssolej excitatoryandinhibitoryresponsestocervicalrootmagneticstimulationinhealthysubjects