Cargando…

¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi

OBJECTIVES: To know the perspective of professionals on aspects and dimensions that should be an indispensable part of Person-Centered Care (PCA). DESIGN: Delphi Technique. LOCATION: Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS: 74 medical experts specializing in family and community medicine (FM), teaching tutors, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pascual López, José Antonio, Gil Pérez, Trinidad, Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio, Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102232
_version_ 1784602094162935808
author Pascual López, José Antonio
Gil Pérez, Trinidad
Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio
Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco
author_facet Pascual López, José Antonio
Gil Pérez, Trinidad
Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio
Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco
author_sort Pascual López, José Antonio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To know the perspective of professionals on aspects and dimensions that should be an indispensable part of Person-Centered Care (PCA). DESIGN: Delphi Technique. LOCATION: Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS: 74 medical experts specializing in family and community medicine (FM), teaching tutors, psychologists and sociologists distributed throughout the national territory (January-June 2015). METHODS: They responded to three questionnaires: first, on aspects that a FP should take into account to carry out PCA in all its dimensions. In the second, they asked about the degree of agreement with each item and dimension in which it was classified. The responses were prioritized in a third questionnaire (Likert scale, score range 1-10). RESULTS: The response rate (RR) to the 1st questionnaire was 54.05%, obtaining 84 items, the most frequent Respect and Comprehensive Attention. The 2nd questionnaire with RR = 48.6%, obtained 52 items with a degree of agreement greater than 75%. The RR of the 3rd questionnaire was 52.7%, obtaining 21 items with a score> 9. The highest values corresponded to essential aspects of PCA: respect, comprehensive care, biopsychosocial approach, patient autonomy, and participation in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: New dimensions were identified: Prevention and health promotion, Resource Management and Clinical Competence, added to those previously described: Biopsychosocial perspective, Doctor as a person, Patient as a person, Doctor-patient relationship and Shared Power and Responsibility. Respect, comprehensive care, the biopsychosocial approach, the patient's autonomy and their participation in decision-making, are the most valued aspects among those selected by the participating professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86050662021-11-24 ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi Pascual López, José Antonio Gil Pérez, Trinidad Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco Aten Primaria Original OBJECTIVES: To know the perspective of professionals on aspects and dimensions that should be an indispensable part of Person-Centered Care (PCA). DESIGN: Delphi Technique. LOCATION: Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS: 74 medical experts specializing in family and community medicine (FM), teaching tutors, psychologists and sociologists distributed throughout the national territory (January-June 2015). METHODS: They responded to three questionnaires: first, on aspects that a FP should take into account to carry out PCA in all its dimensions. In the second, they asked about the degree of agreement with each item and dimension in which it was classified. The responses were prioritized in a third questionnaire (Likert scale, score range 1-10). RESULTS: The response rate (RR) to the 1st questionnaire was 54.05%, obtaining 84 items, the most frequent Respect and Comprehensive Attention. The 2nd questionnaire with RR = 48.6%, obtained 52 items with a degree of agreement greater than 75%. The RR of the 3rd questionnaire was 52.7%, obtaining 21 items with a score> 9. The highest values corresponded to essential aspects of PCA: respect, comprehensive care, biopsychosocial approach, patient autonomy, and participation in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: New dimensions were identified: Prevention and health promotion, Resource Management and Clinical Competence, added to those previously described: Biopsychosocial perspective, Doctor as a person, Patient as a person, Doctor-patient relationship and Shared Power and Responsibility. Respect, comprehensive care, the biopsychosocial approach, the patient's autonomy and their participation in decision-making, are the most valued aspects among those selected by the participating professionals. Elsevier 2022-01 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8605066/ /pubmed/34800871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102232 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Pascual López, José Antonio
Gil Pérez, Trinidad
Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio
Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco
¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title_full ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title_fullStr ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title_full_unstemmed ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title_short ¿Cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? Un estudio Delphi
title_sort ¿cómo valorar la atención centrada en la persona según los profesionales? un estudio delphi
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102232
work_keys_str_mv AT pascuallopezjoseantonio comovalorarlaatencioncentradaenlapersonasegunlosprofesionalesunestudiodelphi
AT gilpereztrinidad comovalorarlaatencioncentradaenlapersonasegunlosprofesionalesunestudiodelphi
AT sanchezsanchezjuanantonio comovalorarlaatencioncentradaenlapersonasegunlosprofesionalesunestudiodelphi
AT menarguezpuchejuanfrancisco comovalorarlaatencioncentradaenlapersonasegunlosprofesionalesunestudiodelphi