Cargando…

Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To identify the SPINK1 or SPINK1‐based model as a more reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Serum samples and related laboratory parameters were collected from 540 subjects (119 healthy donors, 113 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 122 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fang, Liu, Hui, Bai, Youxi, Li, Hui, Wang, Zhonglin, Xu, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24025
_version_ 1784602114235826176
author Wang, Fang
Liu, Hui
Bai, Youxi
Li, Hui
Wang, Zhonglin
Xu, Xin
author_facet Wang, Fang
Liu, Hui
Bai, Youxi
Li, Hui
Wang, Zhonglin
Xu, Xin
author_sort Wang, Fang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the SPINK1 or SPINK1‐based model as a more reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Serum samples and related laboratory parameters were collected from 540 subjects (119 healthy donors, 113 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 122 patients with liver cirrhosis, and 186 patients with HCC). SPINK1 was determined by ELISA assay. Differences in each variable were compared by one‐way ANOVA or Kruskal‐Wallis test. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis was conducted to compare the diagnostic efficiency of alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP), SPINK1, and a SPINK1‐based combine model constructed by binary Logistic regression. RESULTS: In detecting HCC using the other three groups as control, ROC curve analysis revealed that SPINK1 alone reached AUC of 0.899 (0.866–0.933), with the sensitivity of 0.812 of and specificity of 0.953. The combined model increased the AUC to 0.945 (0.926–0.964) with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.910, respectively. For AFP, significantly lower AUC (p < 0.0001) was shown, which was 0.695 (0.645–0.745) with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.634 and 0.718, respectively. In discriminating HCC from liver disease control, AUC of SPINK1 was 0.863(0.826–0.894), the sensitivity and specificity were 0.823 and 0.906, respectively. For combined model, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.915 (0.884–0.940), 0.863, and 0.916, respectively. For detecting early‐stage HCC, SPINK1 and combined model achieved the sensitivity of 0.788 and 0.818, respectively, much higher than AFP of 0.485 (p < 0.05); however, the difference between SPINK1 and combined model was not statistically significant (p = 1). CONCLUSION: We provided solid evidence for SPINK1 as a robust serological tool for HCC diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86051492021-11-24 Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma Wang, Fang Liu, Hui Bai, Youxi Li, Hui Wang, Zhonglin Xu, Xin J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles OBJECTIVES: To identify the SPINK1 or SPINK1‐based model as a more reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Serum samples and related laboratory parameters were collected from 540 subjects (119 healthy donors, 113 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 122 patients with liver cirrhosis, and 186 patients with HCC). SPINK1 was determined by ELISA assay. Differences in each variable were compared by one‐way ANOVA or Kruskal‐Wallis test. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis was conducted to compare the diagnostic efficiency of alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP), SPINK1, and a SPINK1‐based combine model constructed by binary Logistic regression. RESULTS: In detecting HCC using the other three groups as control, ROC curve analysis revealed that SPINK1 alone reached AUC of 0.899 (0.866–0.933), with the sensitivity of 0.812 of and specificity of 0.953. The combined model increased the AUC to 0.945 (0.926–0.964) with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.910, respectively. For AFP, significantly lower AUC (p < 0.0001) was shown, which was 0.695 (0.645–0.745) with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.634 and 0.718, respectively. In discriminating HCC from liver disease control, AUC of SPINK1 was 0.863(0.826–0.894), the sensitivity and specificity were 0.823 and 0.906, respectively. For combined model, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.915 (0.884–0.940), 0.863, and 0.916, respectively. For detecting early‐stage HCC, SPINK1 and combined model achieved the sensitivity of 0.788 and 0.818, respectively, much higher than AFP of 0.485 (p < 0.05); however, the difference between SPINK1 and combined model was not statistically significant (p = 1). CONCLUSION: We provided solid evidence for SPINK1 as a robust serological tool for HCC diagnosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8605149/ /pubmed/34569662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24025 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wang, Fang
Liu, Hui
Bai, Youxi
Li, Hui
Wang, Zhonglin
Xu, Xin
Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Performance of SPINK1 and SPINK1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort performance of spink1 and spink1‐based diagnostic model in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24025
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfang performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liuhui performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT baiyouxi performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lihui performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wangzhonglin performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xuxin performanceofspink1andspink1baseddiagnosticmodelindetectionofhepatocellularcarcinoma