Cargando…
Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533 |
_version_ | 1784602133488730112 |
---|---|
author | Vasdal, Guro Marchewka, Joanna Newberry, Ruth C. Estevez, Inma Kittelsen, Kathe |
author_facet | Vasdal, Guro Marchewka, Joanna Newberry, Ruth C. Estevez, Inma Kittelsen, Kathe |
author_sort | Vasdal, Guro |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86052322021-11-24 Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method Vasdal, Guro Marchewka, Joanna Newberry, Ruth C. Estevez, Inma Kittelsen, Kathe Poult Sci ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries. Elsevier 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8605232/ /pubmed/34784510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR Vasdal, Guro Marchewka, Joanna Newberry, Ruth C. Estevez, Inma Kittelsen, Kathe Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title | Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title_full | Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title_fullStr | Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title_short | Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method |
title_sort | developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the aviary transect method |
topic | ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasdalguro developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod AT marchewkajoanna developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod AT newberryruthc developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod AT estevezinma developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod AT kittelsenkathe developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod |