Cargando…

Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method

This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasdal, Guro, Marchewka, Joanna, Newberry, Ruth C., Estevez, Inma, Kittelsen, Kathe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533
_version_ 1784602133488730112
author Vasdal, Guro
Marchewka, Joanna
Newberry, Ruth C.
Estevez, Inma
Kittelsen, Kathe
author_facet Vasdal, Guro
Marchewka, Joanna
Newberry, Ruth C.
Estevez, Inma
Kittelsen, Kathe
author_sort Vasdal, Guro
collection PubMed
description This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86052322021-11-24 Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method Vasdal, Guro Marchewka, Joanna Newberry, Ruth C. Estevez, Inma Kittelsen, Kathe Poult Sci ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors’ NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries. Elsevier 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8605232/ /pubmed/34784510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR
Vasdal, Guro
Marchewka, Joanna
Newberry, Ruth C.
Estevez, Inma
Kittelsen, Kathe
Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title_full Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title_fullStr Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title_full_unstemmed Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title_short Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the Aviary Transect method
title_sort developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens – the aviary transect method
topic ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533
work_keys_str_mv AT vasdalguro developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod
AT marchewkajoanna developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod
AT newberryruthc developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod
AT estevezinma developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod
AT kittelsenkathe developinganovelwelfareassessmenttoolforloosehousedlayinghenstheaviarytransectmethod