Cargando…
Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, remarkable advancements in systemic drug therapy have improved the prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Individualization is required in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases according to the patient’s prognosis. To establish individualized E...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01940-0 |
_version_ | 1784602204001271808 |
---|---|
author | Makita, Kenji Hamamoto, Yasushi Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kataoka, Masaaki Yamamoto, Shuhei Nagasaki, Kei Ishikawa, Hirofumi Takata, Noriko Tsuruoka, Shintaro Uwatsu, Kotaro Kido, Teruhito |
author_facet | Makita, Kenji Hamamoto, Yasushi Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kataoka, Masaaki Yamamoto, Shuhei Nagasaki, Kei Ishikawa, Hirofumi Takata, Noriko Tsuruoka, Shintaro Uwatsu, Kotaro Kido, Teruhito |
author_sort | Makita, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, remarkable advancements in systemic drug therapy have improved the prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Individualization is required in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases according to the patient’s prognosis. To establish individualized EBRT for bone metastases, we investigated factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2019, 536 patients received EBRT for 751 predominantly osteolytic bone metastases. LC at EBRT sites was evaluated with a follow-up computed tomography. The median EBRT dose was biologically effective dose (BED(10)) (39.0) (range of BED(10): 14.4–71.7 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up time and median time of computed tomography follow-up were 11 (range 1–123) months and 6 (range 1–119) months, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54%, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year LC rates were 83% and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher age (≥ 70 years), non-vertebral bone metastases, unfavorable primary tumor sites (esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer, renal/ureter cancer, sarcoma, melanoma, and mesothelioma), lower EBRT dose (BED(10) < 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of bone-modifying agents (BMAs)/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of bone metastases. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC between BED(10) = 39.0 and BED(10) > 39.0 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding tumor-related factors, primary tumor sites and the sites of bone metastases were significant for the LC. As for treatment-related factors, lower EBRT doses (BED(10) < 39.0 Gy) and non-administration of BMAs/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were associated with poor LC. Dose escalation from BED(10) = 39.0 Gy did not necessarily improve LC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86055492021-11-22 Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study Makita, Kenji Hamamoto, Yasushi Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kataoka, Masaaki Yamamoto, Shuhei Nagasaki, Kei Ishikawa, Hirofumi Takata, Noriko Tsuruoka, Shintaro Uwatsu, Kotaro Kido, Teruhito Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, remarkable advancements in systemic drug therapy have improved the prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Individualization is required in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases according to the patient’s prognosis. To establish individualized EBRT for bone metastases, we investigated factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2019, 536 patients received EBRT for 751 predominantly osteolytic bone metastases. LC at EBRT sites was evaluated with a follow-up computed tomography. The median EBRT dose was biologically effective dose (BED(10)) (39.0) (range of BED(10): 14.4–71.7 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up time and median time of computed tomography follow-up were 11 (range 1–123) months and 6 (range 1–119) months, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54%, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year LC rates were 83% and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher age (≥ 70 years), non-vertebral bone metastases, unfavorable primary tumor sites (esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer, renal/ureter cancer, sarcoma, melanoma, and mesothelioma), lower EBRT dose (BED(10) < 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of bone-modifying agents (BMAs)/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of bone metastases. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC between BED(10) = 39.0 and BED(10) > 39.0 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding tumor-related factors, primary tumor sites and the sites of bone metastases were significant for the LC. As for treatment-related factors, lower EBRT doses (BED(10) < 39.0 Gy) and non-administration of BMAs/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were associated with poor LC. Dose escalation from BED(10) = 39.0 Gy did not necessarily improve LC. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8605549/ /pubmed/34801042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01940-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Makita, Kenji Hamamoto, Yasushi Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kataoka, Masaaki Yamamoto, Shuhei Nagasaki, Kei Ishikawa, Hirofumi Takata, Noriko Tsuruoka, Shintaro Uwatsu, Kotaro Kido, Teruhito Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title | Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title_full | Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title_short | Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
title_sort | local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01940-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makitakenji localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT hamamotoyasushi localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kanzakihiromitsu localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kataokamasaaki localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yamamotoshuhei localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT nagasakikei localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT ishikawahirofumi localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT takatanoriko localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT tsuruokashintaro localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT uwatsukotaro localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kidoteruhito localcontrolofbonemetastasestreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapyinrecentyearsamulticenterretrospectivestudy |