Cargando…
Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2 |
_version_ | 1784602206017683456 |
---|---|
author | Proctor, Enola K. Toker, Emre Tabak, Rachel McKay, Virginia R. Hooley, Cole Evanoff, Bradley |
author_facet | Proctor, Enola K. Toker, Emre Tabak, Rachel McKay, Virginia R. Hooley, Cole Evanoff, Bradley |
author_sort | Proctor, Enola K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts, language distinctions, and questions that entrepreneurs pose to implementation scientists—many of which implementation scientists appear ill-equipped to answer. The paper concludes with recommendations about how concepts from entrepreneurship, notably market viability assessment, can enhance the translation of research discoveries into real-world adoption, sustained use, and population health benefits. The paper further proposes activities that can advance implementation science’s capacity to draw from the field of entrepreneurship, along with the data foundations required to assess and cultivate market demand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86055602021-11-22 Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science Proctor, Enola K. Toker, Emre Tabak, Rachel McKay, Virginia R. Hooley, Cole Evanoff, Bradley Implement Sci Debate This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts, language distinctions, and questions that entrepreneurs pose to implementation scientists—many of which implementation scientists appear ill-equipped to answer. The paper concludes with recommendations about how concepts from entrepreneurship, notably market viability assessment, can enhance the translation of research discoveries into real-world adoption, sustained use, and population health benefits. The paper further proposes activities that can advance implementation science’s capacity to draw from the field of entrepreneurship, along with the data foundations required to assess and cultivate market demand. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8605560/ /pubmed/34801036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Proctor, Enola K. Toker, Emre Tabak, Rachel McKay, Virginia R. Hooley, Cole Evanoff, Bradley Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title | Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title_full | Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title_fullStr | Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title_full_unstemmed | Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title_short | Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
title_sort | market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proctorenolak marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience AT tokeremre marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience AT tabakrachel marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience AT mckayvirginiar marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience AT hooleycole marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience AT evanoffbradley marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience |