Cargando…

Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science

This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proctor, Enola K., Toker, Emre, Tabak, Rachel, McKay, Virginia R., Hooley, Cole, Evanoff, Bradley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2
_version_ 1784602206017683456
author Proctor, Enola K.
Toker, Emre
Tabak, Rachel
McKay, Virginia R.
Hooley, Cole
Evanoff, Bradley
author_facet Proctor, Enola K.
Toker, Emre
Tabak, Rachel
McKay, Virginia R.
Hooley, Cole
Evanoff, Bradley
author_sort Proctor, Enola K.
collection PubMed
description This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts, language distinctions, and questions that entrepreneurs pose to implementation scientists—many of which implementation scientists appear ill-equipped to answer. The paper concludes with recommendations about how concepts from entrepreneurship, notably market viability assessment, can enhance the translation of research discoveries into real-world adoption, sustained use, and population health benefits. The paper further proposes activities that can advance implementation science’s capacity to draw from the field of entrepreneurship, along with the data foundations required to assess and cultivate market demand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86055602021-11-22 Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science Proctor, Enola K. Toker, Emre Tabak, Rachel McKay, Virginia R. Hooley, Cole Evanoff, Bradley Implement Sci Debate This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts, language distinctions, and questions that entrepreneurs pose to implementation scientists—many of which implementation scientists appear ill-equipped to answer. The paper concludes with recommendations about how concepts from entrepreneurship, notably market viability assessment, can enhance the translation of research discoveries into real-world adoption, sustained use, and population health benefits. The paper further proposes activities that can advance implementation science’s capacity to draw from the field of entrepreneurship, along with the data foundations required to assess and cultivate market demand. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8605560/ /pubmed/34801036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Proctor, Enola K.
Toker, Emre
Tabak, Rachel
McKay, Virginia R.
Hooley, Cole
Evanoff, Bradley
Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title_full Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title_fullStr Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title_full_unstemmed Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title_short Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
title_sort market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2
work_keys_str_mv AT proctorenolak marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience
AT tokeremre marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience
AT tabakrachel marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience
AT mckayvirginiar marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience
AT hooleycole marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience
AT evanoffbradley marketviabilityaneglectedconceptinimplementationscience