Cargando…
Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the importance of sex and gender considerations in health research, they are rarely integrated into research design and reporting. We sought to assess the integration of sex, as a biological attribute, and gender, as a socially constructed identity, in publ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0 |
_version_ | 1784602211398975488 |
---|---|
author | Gogovor, Amédé Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon Ekanmian, Giraud Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel Deom Tardif, Alèxe Khadhraoui, Lobna Rheault, Nathalie Moher, David Légaré, France |
author_facet | Gogovor, Amédé Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon Ekanmian, Giraud Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel Deom Tardif, Alèxe Khadhraoui, Lobna Rheault, Nathalie Moher, David Légaré, France |
author_sort | Gogovor, Amédé |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the importance of sex and gender considerations in health research, they are rarely integrated into research design and reporting. We sought to assess the integration of sex, as a biological attribute, and gender, as a socially constructed identity, in published reporting guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published reporting guidelines listed on the EQUATOR website (www.equator-nework.org) from inception until December 2018. We selected all reporting guidelines (original and extensions) listed in the EQUATOR library. We used EndNote Citation Software to build a database of the statements of each guideline identified as a "full bibliographic reference" and retrieved the full texts. Reviewers independently extracted the data on use of sex and gender terms from the checklist/abstract/main text of guidelines. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 407 reporting guidelines were included; they were published between 1995 and 2018. Of the 407 guidelines, 235 (57.7%) mentioned at least one of the sex- and gender-related words. In the checklist of the reporting guidelines (n = 363), “sex” and “gender” were mentioned in 50 (13.8%) and 40 (11%), respectively. Only one reporting guideline met our criteria (nonbinary, appropriate categorization, and non-interchangeability) for correct use of sex and gender concepts. Trends in the use of "sex" and "gender" in the checklists showed that the use of “sex” only started in 2003, while “gender” has been in use since 1996. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the integration of sex and gender in reporting guidelines based on the use of sex- and gender-related words. Our findings showed a low use and integration of sex and gender concepts and their incorrect use. Authors of reporting guidelines should reduce this gap for a better use of research knowledge. Trial registration PROSPERO no. CRD42019136491. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86055832021-11-22 Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review Gogovor, Amédé Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon Ekanmian, Giraud Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel Deom Tardif, Alèxe Khadhraoui, Lobna Rheault, Nathalie Moher, David Légaré, France Biol Sex Differ Review BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the importance of sex and gender considerations in health research, they are rarely integrated into research design and reporting. We sought to assess the integration of sex, as a biological attribute, and gender, as a socially constructed identity, in published reporting guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published reporting guidelines listed on the EQUATOR website (www.equator-nework.org) from inception until December 2018. We selected all reporting guidelines (original and extensions) listed in the EQUATOR library. We used EndNote Citation Software to build a database of the statements of each guideline identified as a "full bibliographic reference" and retrieved the full texts. Reviewers independently extracted the data on use of sex and gender terms from the checklist/abstract/main text of guidelines. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 407 reporting guidelines were included; they were published between 1995 and 2018. Of the 407 guidelines, 235 (57.7%) mentioned at least one of the sex- and gender-related words. In the checklist of the reporting guidelines (n = 363), “sex” and “gender” were mentioned in 50 (13.8%) and 40 (11%), respectively. Only one reporting guideline met our criteria (nonbinary, appropriate categorization, and non-interchangeability) for correct use of sex and gender concepts. Trends in the use of "sex" and "gender" in the checklists showed that the use of “sex” only started in 2003, while “gender” has been in use since 1996. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the integration of sex and gender in reporting guidelines based on the use of sex- and gender-related words. Our findings showed a low use and integration of sex and gender concepts and their incorrect use. Authors of reporting guidelines should reduce this gap for a better use of research knowledge. Trial registration PROSPERO no. CRD42019136491. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8605583/ /pubmed/34801060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Gogovor, Amédé Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon Ekanmian, Giraud Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel Deom Tardif, Alèxe Khadhraoui, Lobna Rheault, Nathalie Moher, David Légaré, France Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title | Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title_full | Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title_short | Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
title_sort | sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gogovoramede sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT zomahounhervetchalavignon sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT ekanmiangiraud sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT adissoevehouenoulionel sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT deomtardifalexe sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT khadhraouilobna sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT rheaultnathalie sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT moherdavid sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview AT legarefrance sexandgenderconsiderationsinreportingguidelinesforhealthresearchasystematicreview |