Cargando…

No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees

BACKGROUND: Glyphosate is the world’s most used pesticide and it is used without the mitigation measures that could reduce the exposure of pollinators to it. However, studies are starting to suggest negative impacts of this pesticide on bees, an essential group of pollinators. Accordingly, whether g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straw, Edward A., Brown, Mark J.F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820203
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12486
_version_ 1784602221701234688
author Straw, Edward A.
Brown, Mark J.F.
author_facet Straw, Edward A.
Brown, Mark J.F.
author_sort Straw, Edward A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glyphosate is the world’s most used pesticide and it is used without the mitigation measures that could reduce the exposure of pollinators to it. However, studies are starting to suggest negative impacts of this pesticide on bees, an essential group of pollinators. Accordingly, whether glyphosate, alone or alongside other stressors, is detrimental to bee health is a vital question. Bees are suffering declines across the globe, and pesticides, including glyphosate, have been suggested as being factors in these declines. METHODS: Here we test, across a range of experimental paradigms, whether glyphosate impacts a wild bumble bee species, Bombus terrestris. In addition, we build upon existing work with honey bees testing glyphosate-parasite interactions by conducting fully crossed experiments with glyphosate and a common bumble bee trypanosome gut parasite, Crithidia bombi. We utilised regulatory acute toxicity testing protocols, modified to allow for exposure to multiple stressors. These protocols are expanded upon to test for effects on long term survival (20 days). Microcolony testing, using unmated workers, was employed to measure the impacts of either stressor on a proxy of reproductive success. This microcolony testing was conducted with both acute and chronic exposure to cover a range of exposure scenarios. RESULTS: We found no effects of acute or chronic exposure to glyphosate, over a range of timespans post-exposure, on mortality or a range of sublethal metrics. We also found no interaction between glyphosate and Crithidia bombi in any metric, although there was conflicting evidence of increased parasite intensity after an acute exposure to glyphosate. In contrast to published literature, we found no direct impacts of this parasite on bee health. Our testing focussed on mortality and worker reproduction, so impacts of either or both of these stressors on other sublethal metrics could still exist. CONCLUSIONS: Our results expand the current knowledge on glyphosate by testing a previously untested species, Bombus terrestris, using acute exposure, and by incorporating a parasite never before tested alongside glyphosate. In conclusion our results find that glyphosate, as an active ingredient, is unlikely to be harmful to bumble bees either alone, or alongside Crithidia bombi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86057622021-11-23 No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees Straw, Edward A. Brown, Mark J.F. PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Glyphosate is the world’s most used pesticide and it is used without the mitigation measures that could reduce the exposure of pollinators to it. However, studies are starting to suggest negative impacts of this pesticide on bees, an essential group of pollinators. Accordingly, whether glyphosate, alone or alongside other stressors, is detrimental to bee health is a vital question. Bees are suffering declines across the globe, and pesticides, including glyphosate, have been suggested as being factors in these declines. METHODS: Here we test, across a range of experimental paradigms, whether glyphosate impacts a wild bumble bee species, Bombus terrestris. In addition, we build upon existing work with honey bees testing glyphosate-parasite interactions by conducting fully crossed experiments with glyphosate and a common bumble bee trypanosome gut parasite, Crithidia bombi. We utilised regulatory acute toxicity testing protocols, modified to allow for exposure to multiple stressors. These protocols are expanded upon to test for effects on long term survival (20 days). Microcolony testing, using unmated workers, was employed to measure the impacts of either stressor on a proxy of reproductive success. This microcolony testing was conducted with both acute and chronic exposure to cover a range of exposure scenarios. RESULTS: We found no effects of acute or chronic exposure to glyphosate, over a range of timespans post-exposure, on mortality or a range of sublethal metrics. We also found no interaction between glyphosate and Crithidia bombi in any metric, although there was conflicting evidence of increased parasite intensity after an acute exposure to glyphosate. In contrast to published literature, we found no direct impacts of this parasite on bee health. Our testing focussed on mortality and worker reproduction, so impacts of either or both of these stressors on other sublethal metrics could still exist. CONCLUSIONS: Our results expand the current knowledge on glyphosate by testing a previously untested species, Bombus terrestris, using acute exposure, and by incorporating a parasite never before tested alongside glyphosate. In conclusion our results find that glyphosate, as an active ingredient, is unlikely to be harmful to bumble bees either alone, or alongside Crithidia bombi. PeerJ Inc. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8605762/ /pubmed/34820203 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12486 Text en ©2021 Straw and Brown https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Straw, Edward A.
Brown, Mark J.F.
No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title_full No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title_fullStr No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title_full_unstemmed No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title_short No evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
title_sort no evidence of effects or interaction between the widely used herbicide, glyphosate, and a common parasite in bumble bees
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820203
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12486
work_keys_str_mv AT strawedwarda noevidenceofeffectsorinteractionbetweenthewidelyusedherbicideglyphosateandacommonparasiteinbumblebees
AT brownmarkjf noevidenceofeffectsorinteractionbetweenthewidelyusedherbicideglyphosateandacommonparasiteinbumblebees