Cargando…
Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, man...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4 |
_version_ | 1784602224384540672 |
---|---|
author | Jewett, Patricia I. Vogel, Rachel I. Ghebre, Rahel Hui, Jane Y. C. Parsons, Helen M. Rao, Arpit Sagaram, Smitha Blaes, Anne H. |
author_facet | Jewett, Patricia I. Vogel, Rachel I. Ghebre, Rahel Hui, Jane Y. C. Parsons, Helen M. Rao, Arpit Sagaram, Smitha Blaes, Anne H. |
author_sort | Jewett, Patricia I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, manifesting as differences in overall care participation, and in differential video versus phone use for telehealth. METHODS: We reviewed visits by cancer survivors between January and December 2020 at a designated cancer center in Minnesota. We used descriptive statistics, data visualization, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to compare visit modalities and trends over time by age, urban/rural status, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 159,301 visits, including 33,242 telehealth visits, older and rural-dwelling individuals were underrepresented in telehealth compared with in-person care. Non-Hispanic White individuals, those aged 18–69 years, and urban residents used video for > 50% of their telehealth visits. In contrast, those aged ≥ 70 years, rural residents, and most patient groups of color used video for only 33–43% of their telehealth visits. Video use increased with time for everyone, but relative differences in telehealth modalities persisted. Visits of Black/African American patients temporarily fell in spring/summer 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore reduced uptake of telehealth, especially video, among potentially vulnerable patient populations. Future research should evaluate reasons for differential telehealth utilization and whether visit modality (in-person versus video versus phone) affects cancer outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A long-term cancer care model with integrated telehealth elements needs to account for specific barriers for vulnerable populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86057762021-11-22 Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status Jewett, Patricia I. Vogel, Rachel I. Ghebre, Rahel Hui, Jane Y. C. Parsons, Helen M. Rao, Arpit Sagaram, Smitha Blaes, Anne H. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, manifesting as differences in overall care participation, and in differential video versus phone use for telehealth. METHODS: We reviewed visits by cancer survivors between January and December 2020 at a designated cancer center in Minnesota. We used descriptive statistics, data visualization, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to compare visit modalities and trends over time by age, urban/rural status, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 159,301 visits, including 33,242 telehealth visits, older and rural-dwelling individuals were underrepresented in telehealth compared with in-person care. Non-Hispanic White individuals, those aged 18–69 years, and urban residents used video for > 50% of their telehealth visits. In contrast, those aged ≥ 70 years, rural residents, and most patient groups of color used video for only 33–43% of their telehealth visits. Video use increased with time for everyone, but relative differences in telehealth modalities persisted. Visits of Black/African American patients temporarily fell in spring/summer 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore reduced uptake of telehealth, especially video, among potentially vulnerable patient populations. Future research should evaluate reasons for differential telehealth utilization and whether visit modality (in-person versus video versus phone) affects cancer outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A long-term cancer care model with integrated telehealth elements needs to account for specific barriers for vulnerable populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4. Springer US 2021-11-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8605776/ /pubmed/34800257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Jewett, Patricia I. Vogel, Rachel I. Ghebre, Rahel Hui, Jane Y. C. Parsons, Helen M. Rao, Arpit Sagaram, Smitha Blaes, Anne H. Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title | Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title_full | Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title_fullStr | Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title_short | Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
title_sort | telehealth in cancer care during covid-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jewettpatriciai telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT vogelracheli telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT ghebrerahel telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT huijaneyc telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT parsonshelenm telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT raoarpit telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT sagaramsmitha telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus AT blaesanneh telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus |