Cargando…

Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status

PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jewett, Patricia I., Vogel, Rachel I., Ghebre, Rahel, Hui, Jane Y. C., Parsons, Helen M., Rao, Arpit, Sagaram, Smitha, Blaes, Anne H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4
_version_ 1784602224384540672
author Jewett, Patricia I.
Vogel, Rachel I.
Ghebre, Rahel
Hui, Jane Y. C.
Parsons, Helen M.
Rao, Arpit
Sagaram, Smitha
Blaes, Anne H.
author_facet Jewett, Patricia I.
Vogel, Rachel I.
Ghebre, Rahel
Hui, Jane Y. C.
Parsons, Helen M.
Rao, Arpit
Sagaram, Smitha
Blaes, Anne H.
author_sort Jewett, Patricia I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, manifesting as differences in overall care participation, and in differential video versus phone use for telehealth. METHODS: We reviewed visits by cancer survivors between January and December 2020 at a designated cancer center in Minnesota. We used descriptive statistics, data visualization, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to compare visit modalities and trends over time by age, urban/rural status, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 159,301 visits, including 33,242 telehealth visits, older and rural-dwelling individuals were underrepresented in telehealth compared with in-person care. Non-Hispanic White individuals, those aged 18–69 years, and urban residents used video for > 50% of their telehealth visits. In contrast, those aged ≥ 70 years, rural residents, and most patient groups of color used video for only 33–43% of their telehealth visits. Video use increased with time for everyone, but relative differences in telehealth modalities persisted. Visits of Black/African American patients temporarily fell in spring/summer 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore reduced uptake of telehealth, especially video, among potentially vulnerable patient populations. Future research should evaluate reasons for differential telehealth utilization and whether visit modality (in-person versus video versus phone) affects cancer outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A long-term cancer care model with integrated telehealth elements needs to account for specific barriers for vulnerable populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86057762021-11-22 Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status Jewett, Patricia I. Vogel, Rachel I. Ghebre, Rahel Hui, Jane Y. C. Parsons, Helen M. Rao, Arpit Sagaram, Smitha Blaes, Anne H. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Telehealth may remain an integral part of cancer survivorship care after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While telehealth may reduce travel/waiting times and costs for many patients, it may also create new barriers that could exacerbate care disparities in historically underserved populations, manifesting as differences in overall care participation, and in differential video versus phone use for telehealth. METHODS: We reviewed visits by cancer survivors between January and December 2020 at a designated cancer center in Minnesota. We used descriptive statistics, data visualization, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to compare visit modalities and trends over time by age, urban/rural status, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 159,301 visits, including 33,242 telehealth visits, older and rural-dwelling individuals were underrepresented in telehealth compared with in-person care. Non-Hispanic White individuals, those aged 18–69 years, and urban residents used video for > 50% of their telehealth visits. In contrast, those aged ≥ 70 years, rural residents, and most patient groups of color used video for only 33–43% of their telehealth visits. Video use increased with time for everyone, but relative differences in telehealth modalities persisted. Visits of Black/African American patients temporarily fell in spring/summer 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore reduced uptake of telehealth, especially video, among potentially vulnerable patient populations. Future research should evaluate reasons for differential telehealth utilization and whether visit modality (in-person versus video versus phone) affects cancer outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A long-term cancer care model with integrated telehealth elements needs to account for specific barriers for vulnerable populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4. Springer US 2021-11-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8605776/ /pubmed/34800257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Jewett, Patricia I.
Vogel, Rachel I.
Ghebre, Rahel
Hui, Jane Y. C.
Parsons, Helen M.
Rao, Arpit
Sagaram, Smitha
Blaes, Anne H.
Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title_full Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title_fullStr Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title_short Telehealth in cancer care during COVID-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
title_sort telehealth in cancer care during covid-19: disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and residential status
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01133-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jewettpatriciai telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT vogelracheli telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT ghebrerahel telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT huijaneyc telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT parsonshelenm telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT raoarpit telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT sagaramsmitha telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus
AT blaesanneh telehealthincancercareduringcovid19disparitiesbyageraceethnicityandresidentialstatus