Cargando…

Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy

BACKGROUND: Real-world studies of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) have reported suboptimal adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe treatment patterns, relapses, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in MS patients experiencing their first observed DMT switch. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freeman, Leorah, Kee, Arianna, Tian, Marc, Mehta, Rina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-021-00251-w
_version_ 1784602258567069696
author Freeman, Leorah
Kee, Arianna
Tian, Marc
Mehta, Rina
author_facet Freeman, Leorah
Kee, Arianna
Tian, Marc
Mehta, Rina
author_sort Freeman, Leorah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-world studies of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) have reported suboptimal adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe treatment patterns, relapses, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in MS patients experiencing their first observed DMT switch. METHODS: In this retrospective, claims database study, adult patients were selected if they had an MS diagnosis and DMT claim during the study period (1 January 2009–31 March 2019). Patients who switched to a new DMT between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018 were included. Adherence, persistence, relapses, and all-cause and MS-related healthcare utilization and costs were reported pre- and post-index. RESULTS: In total, 1554 MS patients were identified; the mean age was 46 years and most (74%) were female. The majority of patients switched from an injectable DMT (n = 1116; 71.8%), and patients generally switched to an oral DMT (n = 878; 57%). Among patients who switched DMTs, 46.0% (n = 715) were nonadherent, 42% (n = 645) were nonpersistent, and 21.5% (n = 334) relapsed in the 12 months post-switch. An increase in all-cause and MS-related healthcare costs was observed pre- to post-index for all patients. Cost drivers included outpatient visit costs and pharmacy prescriptions. Compared with patients who switched to an injectable DMT, those who switched to an oral DMT had significantly higher persistence and adherence. No significant difference was observed in post-index relapse or all-cause and MS-related total cost of care. CONCLUSION: Low adherence and poor persistence remain following an initial DMT switch; however, patients who switched to oral DMTs had higher persistence and adherence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00251-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8605953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86059532021-11-24 Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy Freeman, Leorah Kee, Arianna Tian, Marc Mehta, Rina Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Real-world studies of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) have reported suboptimal adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe treatment patterns, relapses, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in MS patients experiencing their first observed DMT switch. METHODS: In this retrospective, claims database study, adult patients were selected if they had an MS diagnosis and DMT claim during the study period (1 January 2009–31 March 2019). Patients who switched to a new DMT between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018 were included. Adherence, persistence, relapses, and all-cause and MS-related healthcare utilization and costs were reported pre- and post-index. RESULTS: In total, 1554 MS patients were identified; the mean age was 46 years and most (74%) were female. The majority of patients switched from an injectable DMT (n = 1116; 71.8%), and patients generally switched to an oral DMT (n = 878; 57%). Among patients who switched DMTs, 46.0% (n = 715) were nonadherent, 42% (n = 645) were nonpersistent, and 21.5% (n = 334) relapsed in the 12 months post-switch. An increase in all-cause and MS-related healthcare costs was observed pre- to post-index for all patients. Cost drivers included outpatient visit costs and pharmacy prescriptions. Compared with patients who switched to an injectable DMT, those who switched to an oral DMT had significantly higher persistence and adherence. No significant difference was observed in post-index relapse or all-cause and MS-related total cost of care. CONCLUSION: Low adherence and poor persistence remain following an initial DMT switch; however, patients who switched to oral DMTs had higher persistence and adherence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00251-w. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8605953/ /pubmed/34136997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-021-00251-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Freeman, Leorah
Kee, Arianna
Tian, Marc
Mehta, Rina
Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_full Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_fullStr Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_short Retrospective Claims Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Relapse, Utilization, and Cost Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_sort retrospective claims analysis of treatment patterns, relapse, utilization, and cost among patients with multiple sclerosis initiating second-line disease-modifying therapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-021-00251-w
work_keys_str_mv AT freemanleorah retrospectiveclaimsanalysisoftreatmentpatternsrelapseutilizationandcostamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT keearianna retrospectiveclaimsanalysisoftreatmentpatternsrelapseutilizationandcostamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT tianmarc retrospectiveclaimsanalysisoftreatmentpatternsrelapseutilizationandcostamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT mehtarina retrospectiveclaimsanalysisoftreatmentpatternsrelapseutilizationandcostamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy