Cargando…

Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process

BACKGROUND: Processes such as prior authorization (PA) for medications, implemented by health insurance companies to ensure that safe, appropriate, cost-effective, and evidence-based care is provided to all members, have created inefficiencies within healthcare systems. Thus, healthcare systems have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Laney K., Ladd, Ilene G., Gregor, Christina, Evans, Michael A., Graham, Jove, Gionfriddo, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07287-2
_version_ 1784602275519397888
author Jones, Laney K.
Ladd, Ilene G.
Gregor, Christina
Evans, Michael A.
Graham, Jove
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
author_facet Jones, Laney K.
Ladd, Ilene G.
Gregor, Christina
Evans, Michael A.
Graham, Jove
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
author_sort Jones, Laney K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Processes such as prior authorization (PA) for medications, implemented by health insurance companies to ensure that safe, appropriate, cost-effective, and evidence-based care is provided to all members, have created inefficiencies within healthcare systems. Thus, healthcare systems have implemented supplemental processes to reduce burden and ensure efficiency, timeliness, and appropriate care. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate implementation outcomes of two initiatives related to PA for medications: a common record that records all PA-related information that was integrated into the health record and an auto-routing of specialty prescriptions to a hospital-owned specialty pharmacy. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with medical staff to understand their experience, acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of these initiatives guided by Proctor’s Framework for Implementation Outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using consensus coding. RESULTS: Eleven medical staff participated in semi-structured interviews. The two initiatives were analyzed together because the findings were similar across both for our outcomes of acceptability, adoption, and feasibility. Participants found the implemented initiatives to be acceptable and beneficial but felt there were still challenges with the new workflow. The initiatives were fully adopted by only one clinic site within the healthcare system, but limitations arose when adopting to another site. Individuals felt the initiatives were feasible and improved workflow, communication, and transparency. However, participants described future adaptations that would help improve this process including improved standardization, automation, and transparency. CONCLUSION: The acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of two initiatives to improve the PA process within the one clinical site were well received but issues of generalizability limited the initiatives adoption system wide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07287-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86060662021-11-22 Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process Jones, Laney K. Ladd, Ilene G. Gregor, Christina Evans, Michael A. Graham, Jove Gionfriddo, Michael R. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Processes such as prior authorization (PA) for medications, implemented by health insurance companies to ensure that safe, appropriate, cost-effective, and evidence-based care is provided to all members, have created inefficiencies within healthcare systems. Thus, healthcare systems have implemented supplemental processes to reduce burden and ensure efficiency, timeliness, and appropriate care. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate implementation outcomes of two initiatives related to PA for medications: a common record that records all PA-related information that was integrated into the health record and an auto-routing of specialty prescriptions to a hospital-owned specialty pharmacy. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with medical staff to understand their experience, acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of these initiatives guided by Proctor’s Framework for Implementation Outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using consensus coding. RESULTS: Eleven medical staff participated in semi-structured interviews. The two initiatives were analyzed together because the findings were similar across both for our outcomes of acceptability, adoption, and feasibility. Participants found the implemented initiatives to be acceptable and beneficial but felt there were still challenges with the new workflow. The initiatives were fully adopted by only one clinic site within the healthcare system, but limitations arose when adopting to another site. Individuals felt the initiatives were feasible and improved workflow, communication, and transparency. However, participants described future adaptations that would help improve this process including improved standardization, automation, and transparency. CONCLUSION: The acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of two initiatives to improve the PA process within the one clinical site were well received but issues of generalizability limited the initiatives adoption system wide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07287-2. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8606066/ /pubmed/34801025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07287-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Laney K.
Ladd, Ilene G.
Gregor, Christina
Evans, Michael A.
Graham, Jove
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title_full Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title_fullStr Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title_short Evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
title_sort evaluating implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, and feasibility) of two initiatives to improve the medication prior authorization process
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07287-2
work_keys_str_mv AT joneslaneyk evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess
AT laddileneg evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess
AT gregorchristina evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess
AT evansmichaela evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess
AT grahamjove evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess
AT gionfriddomichaelr evaluatingimplementationoutcomesacceptabilityadoptionandfeasibilityoftwoinitiativestoimprovethemedicationpriorauthorizationprocess