Cargando…

Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method

BACKGROUND: The natural indirect effect (NIE) and mediation proportion (MP) are two measures of primary interest in mediation analysis. The standard approach for mediation analysis is through the product method, which involves a model for the outcome conditional on the mediator and exposure and anot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Chao, Spiegelman, Donna, Li, Fan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4
_version_ 1784602282297393152
author Cheng, Chao
Spiegelman, Donna
Li, Fan
author_facet Cheng, Chao
Spiegelman, Donna
Li, Fan
author_sort Cheng, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The natural indirect effect (NIE) and mediation proportion (MP) are two measures of primary interest in mediation analysis. The standard approach for mediation analysis is through the product method, which involves a model for the outcome conditional on the mediator and exposure and another model describing the exposure–mediator relationship. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively develop and investigate the finite-sample performance of NIE and MP estimators via the product method. METHODS: With four common data types with a continuous/binary outcome and a continuous/binary mediator, we propose closed-form interval estimators for NIE and MP via the theory of multivariate delta method, and evaluate its empirical performance relative to the bootstrap approach. In addition, we have observed that the rare outcome assumption is frequently invoked to approximate the NIE and MP with a binary outcome, although this approximation may lead to non-negligible bias when the outcome is common. We therefore introduce the exact expressions for NIE and MP with a binary outcome without the rare outcome assumption and compare its performance with the approximate estimators. RESULTS: Simulation studies suggest that the proposed interval estimator provides satisfactory coverage when the sample size ≥500 for the scenarios with a continuous outcome and sample size ≥20,000 and number of cases ≥500 for the scenarios with a binary outcome. In the binary outcome scenarios, the approximate estimators based on the rare outcome assumption worked well when outcome prevalence less than 5% but could lead to substantial bias when the outcome is common; in contrast, the exact estimators always perform well under all outcome prevalences considered. CONCLUSIONS: Under samples sizes commonly encountered in epidemiology and public health research, the proposed interval estimator is valid for constructing confidence interval. For a binary outcome, the exact estimator without the rare outcome assumption is more robust and stable to estimate NIE and MP. An R package mediateP is developed to implement the methods for point and variance estimation discussed in this paper. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86060992021-11-22 Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method Cheng, Chao Spiegelman, Donna Li, Fan BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: The natural indirect effect (NIE) and mediation proportion (MP) are two measures of primary interest in mediation analysis. The standard approach for mediation analysis is through the product method, which involves a model for the outcome conditional on the mediator and exposure and another model describing the exposure–mediator relationship. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively develop and investigate the finite-sample performance of NIE and MP estimators via the product method. METHODS: With four common data types with a continuous/binary outcome and a continuous/binary mediator, we propose closed-form interval estimators for NIE and MP via the theory of multivariate delta method, and evaluate its empirical performance relative to the bootstrap approach. In addition, we have observed that the rare outcome assumption is frequently invoked to approximate the NIE and MP with a binary outcome, although this approximation may lead to non-negligible bias when the outcome is common. We therefore introduce the exact expressions for NIE and MP with a binary outcome without the rare outcome assumption and compare its performance with the approximate estimators. RESULTS: Simulation studies suggest that the proposed interval estimator provides satisfactory coverage when the sample size ≥500 for the scenarios with a continuous outcome and sample size ≥20,000 and number of cases ≥500 for the scenarios with a binary outcome. In the binary outcome scenarios, the approximate estimators based on the rare outcome assumption worked well when outcome prevalence less than 5% but could lead to substantial bias when the outcome is common; in contrast, the exact estimators always perform well under all outcome prevalences considered. CONCLUSIONS: Under samples sizes commonly encountered in epidemiology and public health research, the proposed interval estimator is valid for constructing confidence interval. For a binary outcome, the exact estimator without the rare outcome assumption is more robust and stable to estimate NIE and MP. An R package mediateP is developed to implement the methods for point and variance estimation discussed in this paper. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4). BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8606099/ /pubmed/34800985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cheng, Chao
Spiegelman, Donna
Li, Fan
Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title_full Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title_fullStr Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title_short Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
title_sort estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chengchao estimatingthenaturalindirecteffectandthemediationproportionviatheproductmethod
AT spiegelmandonna estimatingthenaturalindirecteffectandthemediationproportionviatheproductmethod
AT lifan estimatingthenaturalindirecteffectandthemediationproportionviatheproductmethod