Cargando…

Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval

Traditional face-to-face laboratory studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of how misinformation effects develop. However, an area of emerging concern that has been relatively under-researched is the impact of misinformation following exposure to traumatic events that are viewed onlin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sievwright, Olivia, Philipp, Michael, Drummond, Aaron, Knapp, Katie, Ross, Kirsty
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820164
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12299
_version_ 1784602286359576576
author Sievwright, Olivia
Philipp, Michael
Drummond, Aaron
Knapp, Katie
Ross, Kirsty
author_facet Sievwright, Olivia
Philipp, Michael
Drummond, Aaron
Knapp, Katie
Ross, Kirsty
author_sort Sievwright, Olivia
collection PubMed
description Traditional face-to-face laboratory studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of how misinformation effects develop. However, an area of emerging concern that has been relatively under-researched is the impact of misinformation following exposure to traumatic events that are viewed online. Here we describe a novel method for investigating misinformation effects in an online context. Participants (N = 99) completed the study online. They first watched a 10-min video of a fictional school shooting. Between 5 and 10 days later, they were randomly assigned to receive misinformation or no misinformation about the video before completing a recognition test. Misinformed participants were less accurate at discriminating between misinformation and true statements than control participants. This effect was most strongly supported by ROC analyses (Cohen’s d = 0.59, BF10 = 8.34). Misinformation effects can be established in an online experiment using candid violent viral-style video stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86061202021-11-23 Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval Sievwright, Olivia Philipp, Michael Drummond, Aaron Knapp, Katie Ross, Kirsty PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology Traditional face-to-face laboratory studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of how misinformation effects develop. However, an area of emerging concern that has been relatively under-researched is the impact of misinformation following exposure to traumatic events that are viewed online. Here we describe a novel method for investigating misinformation effects in an online context. Participants (N = 99) completed the study online. They first watched a 10-min video of a fictional school shooting. Between 5 and 10 days later, they were randomly assigned to receive misinformation or no misinformation about the video before completing a recognition test. Misinformed participants were less accurate at discriminating between misinformation and true statements than control participants. This effect was most strongly supported by ROC analyses (Cohen’s d = 0.59, BF10 = 8.34). Misinformation effects can be established in an online experiment using candid violent viral-style video stimuli. PeerJ Inc. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8606120/ /pubmed/34820164 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12299 Text en © 2021 Sievwright et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Sievwright, Olivia
Philipp, Michael
Drummond, Aaron
Knapp, Katie
Ross, Kirsty
Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title_full Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title_fullStr Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title_full_unstemmed Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title_short Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
title_sort misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820164
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12299
work_keys_str_mv AT sievwrightolivia misinformationeffectsinanonlinesampleresultsofanexperimentalstudywithafivedayretentioninterval
AT philippmichael misinformationeffectsinanonlinesampleresultsofanexperimentalstudywithafivedayretentioninterval
AT drummondaaron misinformationeffectsinanonlinesampleresultsofanexperimentalstudywithafivedayretentioninterval
AT knappkatie misinformationeffectsinanonlinesampleresultsofanexperimentalstudywithafivedayretentioninterval
AT rosskirsty misinformationeffectsinanonlinesampleresultsofanexperimentalstudywithafivedayretentioninterval