Cargando…

Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors that hinder 24-h patient discharge after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in a low-volume practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who fulfilled regional criteria and underwent primary LRYGB from 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, Hung-Chieh, Hsu, Shih-Chang, Hsu, An-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05813-z
_version_ 1784602305201438720
author Lo, Hung-Chieh
Hsu, Shih-Chang
Hsu, An-Chih
author_facet Lo, Hung-Chieh
Hsu, Shih-Chang
Hsu, An-Chih
author_sort Lo, Hung-Chieh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors that hinder 24-h patient discharge after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in a low-volume practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who fulfilled regional criteria and underwent primary LRYGB from 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were discharged on the morning of the first postoperative day (POD1) after meeting the predefined criteria. The assessed outcome measures (POD1 vital signs, laboratory findings, pain scores and nausea/vomiting) and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the early (stay ≤ 24 h) and delayed (>24 h) groups. RESULTS: For 107 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 48 (44.9%) were discharged within 24 h. There were no differences in the baseline demographics, except that the early group was more likely to have a previous abdominal operation (35.4% vs. 16.9%). Both groups had similar operation durations (89 min vs. 92 min), but the early group had a markedly shortened length of stay (23 (24–22) h vs. 27 (47–26) h). The POD1 parameters were the same between the groups, except that the delay group had a significantly higher visual analog scale score, with fewer patient scores of 0. Patients who were younger and female were more likely to need additional IV analgesics. No POD1 antiemesis was required throughout the study. There was no increase in the 30-day complications. CONCLUSION: Patient discharge at 24 h post-LRYGB is feasible and safe in a low-volume practice. A more comprehensive pain relief strategy may be required before generalizing this approach. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86062492021-11-22 Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center Lo, Hung-Chieh Hsu, Shih-Chang Hsu, An-Chih Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors that hinder 24-h patient discharge after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in a low-volume practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who fulfilled regional criteria and underwent primary LRYGB from 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were discharged on the morning of the first postoperative day (POD1) after meeting the predefined criteria. The assessed outcome measures (POD1 vital signs, laboratory findings, pain scores and nausea/vomiting) and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the early (stay ≤ 24 h) and delayed (>24 h) groups. RESULTS: For 107 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 48 (44.9%) were discharged within 24 h. There were no differences in the baseline demographics, except that the early group was more likely to have a previous abdominal operation (35.4% vs. 16.9%). Both groups had similar operation durations (89 min vs. 92 min), but the early group had a markedly shortened length of stay (23 (24–22) h vs. 27 (47–26) h). The POD1 parameters were the same between the groups, except that the delay group had a significantly higher visual analog scale score, with fewer patient scores of 0. Patients who were younger and female were more likely to need additional IV analgesics. No POD1 antiemesis was required throughout the study. There was no increase in the 30-day complications. CONCLUSION: Patient discharge at 24 h post-LRYGB is feasible and safe in a low-volume practice. A more comprehensive pain relief strategy may be required before generalizing this approach. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2021-11-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8606249/ /pubmed/34806128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05813-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Lo, Hung-Chieh
Hsu, Shih-Chang
Hsu, An-Chih
Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title_full Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title_fullStr Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title_full_unstemmed Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title_short Factors that Hinder 24-Hour Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis at a Low-Volume Center
title_sort factors that hinder 24-hour discharge after laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: a retrospective analysis at a low-volume center
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05813-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lohungchieh factorsthathinder24hourdischargeafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassaretrospectiveanalysisatalowvolumecenter
AT hsushihchang factorsthathinder24hourdischargeafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassaretrospectiveanalysisatalowvolumecenter
AT hsuanchih factorsthathinder24hourdischargeafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassaretrospectiveanalysisatalowvolumecenter