Cargando…

Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial

BACKGROUND: VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ecker, Hannes, Kolvenbach, Simone, Herff, Holger, Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01502-7
_version_ 1784602311219216384
author Ecker, Hannes
Kolvenbach, Simone
Herff, Holger
Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
author_facet Ecker, Hannes
Kolvenbach, Simone
Herff, Holger
Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
author_sort Ecker, Hannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained importance especially when treating patients with highly contagious infectious diseases, such as during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In this context, VieScope has not been evaluated yet in a clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study compared intubation with VieScope to video-laryngoscopy (GlideScope) in normal and difficult airway in a standardized airway manikin in a randomized controlled simulation trial. Thirty-five medical specialists were asked to perform endotracheal intubation in full personal protective equipment (PPE). Primary endpoint was correct tube position. First-pass rate (i.e., success rate at the first attempt), time until intubation and time until first correct ventilation were registered as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: For correct tracheal tube placement, there was no significant difference between VieScope and GlideScope in normal and difficult airway conditions. VieScope had over 91% fist-pass success rate in normal airway setting. VieScope had a comparable success rate to GlideScope in difficult airway, but had a significantly longer time until intubation and time until ventilation. CONCLUSION: VieScope and GlideScope had high success rates in normal as well as in difficult airway. There was no unrecognized esophageal intubation in either group. Overall time for intubation was longer in the VieScope group, though in an acceptable range given in literature. Results from this simulation study suggest that VieScope may be an acceptable alternative for tracheal intubation in full PPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Registration date: 09/11/2020; TrialID: DRKS00023406).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86062762021-11-22 Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial Ecker, Hannes Kolvenbach, Simone Herff, Holger Wetsch, Wolfgang A. BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained importance especially when treating patients with highly contagious infectious diseases, such as during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In this context, VieScope has not been evaluated yet in a clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study compared intubation with VieScope to video-laryngoscopy (GlideScope) in normal and difficult airway in a standardized airway manikin in a randomized controlled simulation trial. Thirty-five medical specialists were asked to perform endotracheal intubation in full personal protective equipment (PPE). Primary endpoint was correct tube position. First-pass rate (i.e., success rate at the first attempt), time until intubation and time until first correct ventilation were registered as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: For correct tracheal tube placement, there was no significant difference between VieScope and GlideScope in normal and difficult airway conditions. VieScope had over 91% fist-pass success rate in normal airway setting. VieScope had a comparable success rate to GlideScope in difficult airway, but had a significantly longer time until intubation and time until ventilation. CONCLUSION: VieScope and GlideScope had high success rates in normal as well as in difficult airway. There was no unrecognized esophageal intubation in either group. Overall time for intubation was longer in the VieScope group, though in an acceptable range given in literature. Results from this simulation study suggest that VieScope may be an acceptable alternative for tracheal intubation in full PPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Registration date: 09/11/2020; TrialID: DRKS00023406). BioMed Central 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8606276/ /pubmed/34809581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01502-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ecker, Hannes
Kolvenbach, Simone
Herff, Holger
Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title_full Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title_fullStr Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title_full_unstemmed Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title_short Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
title_sort intubation using viescope vs. video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment – a randomized, controlled simulation trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01502-7
work_keys_str_mv AT eckerhannes intubationusingviescopevsvideolaryngoscopyinfullpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial
AT kolvenbachsimone intubationusingviescopevsvideolaryngoscopyinfullpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial
AT herffholger intubationusingviescopevsvideolaryngoscopyinfullpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial
AT wetschwolfganga intubationusingviescopevsvideolaryngoscopyinfullpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial