Cargando…

Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of externally monitored and conventional buried flaps with the goal of determining the usefulness of external monitoring of buried flaps. METHODS: In this case-control study with propensity score matching, 30 patients were evenly divided into externally m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ban, Myung Jin, Na, Gina, Ko, Sungchul, Kim, Joohyun, Heo, Nam Hun, Choi, Eun Chang, Park, Jae Hong, Kim, Won Shik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900154
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00234
_version_ 1784602312928395264
author Ban, Myung Jin
Na, Gina
Ko, Sungchul
Kim, Joohyun
Heo, Nam Hun
Choi, Eun Chang
Park, Jae Hong
Kim, Won Shik
author_facet Ban, Myung Jin
Na, Gina
Ko, Sungchul
Kim, Joohyun
Heo, Nam Hun
Choi, Eun Chang
Park, Jae Hong
Kim, Won Shik
author_sort Ban, Myung Jin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of externally monitored and conventional buried flaps with the goal of determining the usefulness of external monitoring of buried flaps. METHODS: In this case-control study with propensity score matching, 30 patients were evenly divided into externally monitored buried flap and conventional buried flap groups. The total operative time for free flap reconstruction, the flap survival rate, the length of hospital stay, the initial time of a reliable visual assessment, complications, the final diet achieved, and the duration until diet initiation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean operative time for reconstruction was 115 minutes (interquartile range, 85–150 minutes) and 142 minutes (interquartile range, 95–180 minutes) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P= 0.245). The median length of hospital stay was 24 days (interquartile range, 18–30 days) and 27 days (interquartile range, 20–41 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.298). The median duration until diet initiation was 15 days (interquartile range, 15–21 days) and 18 days (interquartile range, 15–34 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.466). The final diet, initial time of a reliable visual assessment, and complications were comparable between the groups, but the external skin paddle provided an excellent visual assessment immediately postoperatively in all cases. CONCLUSION: The outcomes were comparable between the groups, indicating that externalization of the cutaneous component of a buried flap may be a straightforward and useful technique for monitoring a buried anterolateral thigh free flap in laryngopharyngeal reconstructions. The salvage and false-positive rates of compromised flaps should be compared in large subject groups in future studies to prove that the use of an external skin paddle improves flap monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86062842021-12-02 Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction Ban, Myung Jin Na, Gina Ko, Sungchul Kim, Joohyun Heo, Nam Hun Choi, Eun Chang Park, Jae Hong Kim, Won Shik Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of externally monitored and conventional buried flaps with the goal of determining the usefulness of external monitoring of buried flaps. METHODS: In this case-control study with propensity score matching, 30 patients were evenly divided into externally monitored buried flap and conventional buried flap groups. The total operative time for free flap reconstruction, the flap survival rate, the length of hospital stay, the initial time of a reliable visual assessment, complications, the final diet achieved, and the duration until diet initiation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean operative time for reconstruction was 115 minutes (interquartile range, 85–150 minutes) and 142 minutes (interquartile range, 95–180 minutes) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P= 0.245). The median length of hospital stay was 24 days (interquartile range, 18–30 days) and 27 days (interquartile range, 20–41 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.298). The median duration until diet initiation was 15 days (interquartile range, 15–21 days) and 18 days (interquartile range, 15–34 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.466). The final diet, initial time of a reliable visual assessment, and complications were comparable between the groups, but the external skin paddle provided an excellent visual assessment immediately postoperatively in all cases. CONCLUSION: The outcomes were comparable between the groups, indicating that externalization of the cutaneous component of a buried flap may be a straightforward and useful technique for monitoring a buried anterolateral thigh free flap in laryngopharyngeal reconstructions. The salvage and false-positive rates of compromised flaps should be compared in large subject groups in future studies to prove that the use of an external skin paddle improves flap monitoring. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2021-11 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8606284/ /pubmed/32900154 http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00234 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ban, Myung Jin
Na, Gina
Ko, Sungchul
Kim, Joohyun
Heo, Nam Hun
Choi, Eun Chang
Park, Jae Hong
Kim, Won Shik
Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title_full Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title_fullStr Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title_short Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction
title_sort externally monitored versus conventional buried flaps in laryngopharyngeal reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900154
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00234
work_keys_str_mv AT banmyungjin externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT nagina externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT kosungchul externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT kimjoohyun externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT heonamhun externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT choieunchang externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT parkjaehong externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction
AT kimwonshik externallymonitoredversusconventionalburiedflapsinlaryngopharyngealreconstruction