Cargando…

Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions

Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC) is an uncommon cancer with a recognised precursor Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN). Although there are consistent evidence-based guidelines for the management of ASCC, historically this has not been the case for AIN and as a result there have been geographical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brogden, Danielle R. L., Lupi, Micol E. E., Warren, Oliver J., Kontovounisios, Christos, Mills, Sarah C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01156-7
_version_ 1784602327482630144
author Brogden, Danielle R. L.
Lupi, Micol E. E.
Warren, Oliver J.
Kontovounisios, Christos
Mills, Sarah C.
author_facet Brogden, Danielle R. L.
Lupi, Micol E. E.
Warren, Oliver J.
Kontovounisios, Christos
Mills, Sarah C.
author_sort Brogden, Danielle R. L.
collection PubMed
description Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC) is an uncommon cancer with a recognised precursor Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN). Although there are consistent evidence-based guidelines for the management of ASCC, historically this has not been the case for AIN and as a result there have been geographical variations in the recommendations for the treatment of AIN. More recently there have been updates in the literature to the recommendations for the management of AIN. To assess whether we are now closer to achieving an international consensus, we have completed a systematic scoping review of available guidelines for the screening, treatment and follow-up of AIN as a precursor to ASCC. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for available clinical guidelines endorsed by a recognised clinical society that included recommendations on either the screening, treatment or follow-up of AIN. Nine clinical guidelines from three geographical areas were included. The most recent guidelines agreed that screening for AIN in high-risk patients and follow-up after treatment was necessary but there was less consensus on the modality of screening. Six Guidelines recommended the treatment of high-grade AIN and four guidelines describe a follow-up protocol of patients diagnosed with AIN. There appears to be increasing consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients despite a poor evidence base. There is still significant discrepancy in guidance on the method to identify patients at risk of ASCC and AIN despite consensus between geographical regions on which patient subgroups are at the highest risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86063792021-12-03 Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions Brogden, Danielle R. L. Lupi, Micol E. E. Warren, Oliver J. Kontovounisios, Christos Mills, Sarah C. Updates Surg Review Article Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC) is an uncommon cancer with a recognised precursor Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN). Although there are consistent evidence-based guidelines for the management of ASCC, historically this has not been the case for AIN and as a result there have been geographical variations in the recommendations for the treatment of AIN. More recently there have been updates in the literature to the recommendations for the management of AIN. To assess whether we are now closer to achieving an international consensus, we have completed a systematic scoping review of available guidelines for the screening, treatment and follow-up of AIN as a precursor to ASCC. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for available clinical guidelines endorsed by a recognised clinical society that included recommendations on either the screening, treatment or follow-up of AIN. Nine clinical guidelines from three geographical areas were included. The most recent guidelines agreed that screening for AIN in high-risk patients and follow-up after treatment was necessary but there was less consensus on the modality of screening. Six Guidelines recommended the treatment of high-grade AIN and four guidelines describe a follow-up protocol of patients diagnosed with AIN. There appears to be increasing consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients despite a poor evidence base. There is still significant discrepancy in guidance on the method to identify patients at risk of ASCC and AIN despite consensus between geographical regions on which patient subgroups are at the highest risk. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8606379/ /pubmed/34482519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01156-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Brogden, Danielle R. L.
Lupi, Micol E. E.
Warren, Oliver J.
Kontovounisios, Christos
Mills, Sarah C.
Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title_full Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title_fullStr Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title_full_unstemmed Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title_short Comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
title_sort comparing and contrasting clinical consensus and guidelines for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in different geographical regions
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01156-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brogdendaniellerl comparingandcontrastingclinicalconsensusandguidelinesforanalintraepithelialneoplasiaindifferentgeographicalregions
AT lupimicolee comparingandcontrastingclinicalconsensusandguidelinesforanalintraepithelialneoplasiaindifferentgeographicalregions
AT warrenoliverj comparingandcontrastingclinicalconsensusandguidelinesforanalintraepithelialneoplasiaindifferentgeographicalregions
AT kontovounisioschristos comparingandcontrastingclinicalconsensusandguidelinesforanalintraepithelialneoplasiaindifferentgeographicalregions
AT millssarahc comparingandcontrastingclinicalconsensusandguidelinesforanalintraepithelialneoplasiaindifferentgeographicalregions