Cargando…
Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial
To avoid CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated cardiopulmonary side-effects during conventional laparoscopic surgeries, we have developed a gasless laparoscopic operation field formation (LOFF) device for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01154-9 |
_version_ | 1784602328225021952 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Min Zhao, Gang Huang, Anhua Zhang, Kai Wang, Bo Jiang, Zhaoyan Ding, Kan Hu, Hai |
author_facet | Jiang, Min Zhao, Gang Huang, Anhua Zhang, Kai Wang, Bo Jiang, Zhaoyan Ding, Kan Hu, Hai |
author_sort | Jiang, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | To avoid CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated cardiopulmonary side-effects during conventional laparoscopic surgeries, we have developed a gasless laparoscopic operation field formation (LOFF) device for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of the LOFF device for laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy and to verify its advantage of avoiding CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated complications. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial, eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum assisted laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (LESS) or the new gasless LOFF device assisted laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (LOFF-LESS). Outcomes including intra-operative respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, operation time, conversion rate, complication rate, et al were compared between the two groups. A total of 100 patients were randomized to the LESS group [n = 50; mean (SD) age, 49.5 (13.9) years; 24 (48.0%) women] and the LOFF-LESS group [n = 50, mean (SD) age, 47.4 (13.3) years; 27 (54.0%) women]. Compared with the LOFF-LESS group, the LESS group witnessed significant fluctuations in intra-operative respiratory and hemodynamic parameters. The tracheal extubation time of the LESS group was significantly longer (P = 0.001). The gasless LOFF device is safe and feasible for simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy and has a predominance of avoiding CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated cardiopulmonary side-effects. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000033702 GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01154-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8606390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86063902021-12-03 Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial Jiang, Min Zhao, Gang Huang, Anhua Zhang, Kai Wang, Bo Jiang, Zhaoyan Ding, Kan Hu, Hai Updates Surg Original Article To avoid CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated cardiopulmonary side-effects during conventional laparoscopic surgeries, we have developed a gasless laparoscopic operation field formation (LOFF) device for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of the LOFF device for laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy and to verify its advantage of avoiding CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated complications. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial, eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum assisted laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (LESS) or the new gasless LOFF device assisted laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (LOFF-LESS). Outcomes including intra-operative respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, operation time, conversion rate, complication rate, et al were compared between the two groups. A total of 100 patients were randomized to the LESS group [n = 50; mean (SD) age, 49.5 (13.9) years; 24 (48.0%) women] and the LOFF-LESS group [n = 50, mean (SD) age, 47.4 (13.3) years; 27 (54.0%) women]. Compared with the LOFF-LESS group, the LESS group witnessed significant fluctuations in intra-operative respiratory and hemodynamic parameters. The tracheal extubation time of the LESS group was significantly longer (P = 0.001). The gasless LOFF device is safe and feasible for simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy and has a predominance of avoiding CO(2) pneumoperitoneum-associated cardiopulmonary side-effects. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000033702 GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01154-9. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8606390/ /pubmed/34463946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01154-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jiang, Min Zhao, Gang Huang, Anhua Zhang, Kai Wang, Bo Jiang, Zhaoyan Ding, Kan Hu, Hai Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title | Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional co(2) pneumoperitoneum method in laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01154-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangmin comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaogang comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT huanganhua comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhangkai comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT wangbo comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT jiangzhaoyan comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT dingkan comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial AT huhai comparisonofanewgaslessmethodandtheconventionalco2pneumoperitoneummethodinlaparoendoscopicsinglesitecholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial |