Cargando…

Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features

BACKGROUND: The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products requires all parties to establish a tobacco track and trace (T&T) system. In 2016, the European Commission held a public consultation on T&T implementation where parties were asked to respond online to 22 multiple-choice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallagher, Allen William Andrew, Evans-Reeves, Karen, Joshi, Ayush, Hatchard, Jenny, Gilmore, Anna B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-043875
_version_ 1784602338602778624
author Gallagher, Allen William Andrew
Evans-Reeves, Karen
Joshi, Ayush
Hatchard, Jenny
Gilmore, Anna B
author_facet Gallagher, Allen William Andrew
Evans-Reeves, Karen
Joshi, Ayush
Hatchard, Jenny
Gilmore, Anna B
author_sort Gallagher, Allen William Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products requires all parties to establish a tobacco track and trace (T&T) system. In 2016, the European Commission held a public consultation on T&T implementation where parties were asked to respond online to 22 multiple-choice questions and were given additional opportunities to leave comments. In May 2019, the European Union’s (EU) T&T system became operational. This paper explores tobacco industry influence over and policy positions within the consultation process. METHODS: We identified consultation respondents and investigated any financial links with the tobacco industry and if these were transparent. Respondent’s answers to the consultation’s multiple-choice questions were collated to explore whether industry-linked respondents held the same policy positions as transnational tobacco companies (TTCs). Associations between policy positions and respondent’s financial link status were tested using χ(2) and Cranmer’s V tests. FINDINGS: Of the 197 consultation respondents identified, 131 (66.4%) had financial links to the industry; 29 (22.1%) were not transparent about these links. A large number of trade associations responded (87), the majority of which (74/87) had financial links to the industry. There was a clear divide in the policy preferences of respondents with and without a financial link. Collectively, respondents with a financial link supported an industry-operated T&T solution. CONCLUSIONS: There was an extensive lobbying effort by the tobacco industry over the EU’s T&T system, with TTCs’ interests being represented repeatedly through multiple trade associations. The transparency requirements regarding consultation respondents’ affiliations with relevant stakeholders (eg, tobacco manufacturers) should be improved for future consultations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86064412021-12-03 Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features Gallagher, Allen William Andrew Evans-Reeves, Karen Joshi, Ayush Hatchard, Jenny Gilmore, Anna B Tob Control Original Research BACKGROUND: The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products requires all parties to establish a tobacco track and trace (T&T) system. In 2016, the European Commission held a public consultation on T&T implementation where parties were asked to respond online to 22 multiple-choice questions and were given additional opportunities to leave comments. In May 2019, the European Union’s (EU) T&T system became operational. This paper explores tobacco industry influence over and policy positions within the consultation process. METHODS: We identified consultation respondents and investigated any financial links with the tobacco industry and if these were transparent. Respondent’s answers to the consultation’s multiple-choice questions were collated to explore whether industry-linked respondents held the same policy positions as transnational tobacco companies (TTCs). Associations between policy positions and respondent’s financial link status were tested using χ(2) and Cranmer’s V tests. FINDINGS: Of the 197 consultation respondents identified, 131 (66.4%) had financial links to the industry; 29 (22.1%) were not transparent about these links. A large number of trade associations responded (87), the majority of which (74/87) had financial links to the industry. There was a clear divide in the policy preferences of respondents with and without a financial link. Collectively, respondents with a financial link supported an industry-operated T&T solution. CONCLUSIONS: There was an extensive lobbying effort by the tobacco industry over the EU’s T&T system, with TTCs’ interests being represented repeatedly through multiple trade associations. The transparency requirements regarding consultation respondents’ affiliations with relevant stakeholders (eg, tobacco manufacturers) should be improved for future consultations. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8606441/ /pubmed/33023937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-043875 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Gallagher, Allen William Andrew
Evans-Reeves, Karen
Joshi, Ayush
Hatchard, Jenny
Gilmore, Anna B
Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title_full Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title_fullStr Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title_short Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
title_sort analysis of submissions to the eu’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-043875
work_keys_str_mv AT gallagherallenwilliamandrew analysisofsubmissionstotheeuspublicconsultationontobaccotraceabilityandsecurityfeatures
AT evansreeveskaren analysisofsubmissionstotheeuspublicconsultationontobaccotraceabilityandsecurityfeatures
AT joshiayush analysisofsubmissionstotheeuspublicconsultationontobaccotraceabilityandsecurityfeatures
AT hatchardjenny analysisofsubmissionstotheeuspublicconsultationontobaccotraceabilityandsecurityfeatures
AT gilmoreannab analysisofsubmissionstotheeuspublicconsultationontobaccotraceabilityandsecurityfeatures