Cargando…

Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required

Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Gabor, Anderson, Leslie, Ranson, Marc, Sellen, David, McArthur, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873
_version_ 1784602343470268416
author Fischer, Gabor
Anderson, Leslie
Ranson, Marc
Sellen, David
McArthur, Eric
author_facet Fischer, Gabor
Anderson, Leslie
Ranson, Marc
Sellen, David
McArthur, Eric
author_sort Fischer, Gabor
collection PubMed
description Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advocacy efforts. Pathology was identified as a medical specialty by 79.1% of the respondents. Only 34.8% assumed that it takes more than 8 years of post-high school training to become a pathologist. Most commonly, another medical specialist was identified as the ultimate diagnostician on Pap tests (gynaecologist), breast biopsies or malignant surgical excisions (oncologist), gastrointestinal biopsies (gastroenterologist) or prostate biopsies (urologist). The experience gained by undergoing these procedures had minimal impact on understanding the pathologists’ role, since they were identified as ultimate diagnosis makers by the minority of these patients (13.8%–36.4%). The integration of pathologist–interactions into patient care may be a potential solution with benefits beyond improved perceptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86064622021-12-03 Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required Fischer, Gabor Anderson, Leslie Ranson, Marc Sellen, David McArthur, Eric J Clin Pathol Short Report Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advocacy efforts. Pathology was identified as a medical specialty by 79.1% of the respondents. Only 34.8% assumed that it takes more than 8 years of post-high school training to become a pathologist. Most commonly, another medical specialist was identified as the ultimate diagnostician on Pap tests (gynaecologist), breast biopsies or malignant surgical excisions (oncologist), gastrointestinal biopsies (gastroenterologist) or prostate biopsies (urologist). The experience gained by undergoing these procedures had minimal impact on understanding the pathologists’ role, since they were identified as ultimate diagnosis makers by the minority of these patients (13.8%–36.4%). The integration of pathologist–interactions into patient care may be a potential solution with benefits beyond improved perceptions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8606462/ /pubmed/33097589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Report
Fischer, Gabor
Anderson, Leslie
Ranson, Marc
Sellen, David
McArthur, Eric
Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title_full Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title_fullStr Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title_full_unstemmed Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title_short Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
title_sort public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873
work_keys_str_mv AT fischergabor publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired
AT andersonleslie publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired
AT ransonmarc publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired
AT sellendavid publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired
AT mcarthureric publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired