Cargando…
Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required
Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advoc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873 |
_version_ | 1784602343470268416 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Gabor Anderson, Leslie Ranson, Marc Sellen, David McArthur, Eric |
author_facet | Fischer, Gabor Anderson, Leslie Ranson, Marc Sellen, David McArthur, Eric |
author_sort | Fischer, Gabor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advocacy efforts. Pathology was identified as a medical specialty by 79.1% of the respondents. Only 34.8% assumed that it takes more than 8 years of post-high school training to become a pathologist. Most commonly, another medical specialist was identified as the ultimate diagnostician on Pap tests (gynaecologist), breast biopsies or malignant surgical excisions (oncologist), gastrointestinal biopsies (gastroenterologist) or prostate biopsies (urologist). The experience gained by undergoing these procedures had minimal impact on understanding the pathologists’ role, since they were identified as ultimate diagnosis makers by the minority of these patients (13.8%–36.4%). The integration of pathologist–interactions into patient care may be a potential solution with benefits beyond improved perceptions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8606462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86064622021-12-03 Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required Fischer, Gabor Anderson, Leslie Ranson, Marc Sellen, David McArthur, Eric J Clin Pathol Short Report Pathology has been mostly invisible for the public. The missing recognition affects the pathologists’ reputation, and efforts with recruitment and advocacy. Our survey with 387 respondents confirms that the public knowledge on the role of the pathologists has not improved despite campaigns and advocacy efforts. Pathology was identified as a medical specialty by 79.1% of the respondents. Only 34.8% assumed that it takes more than 8 years of post-high school training to become a pathologist. Most commonly, another medical specialist was identified as the ultimate diagnostician on Pap tests (gynaecologist), breast biopsies or malignant surgical excisions (oncologist), gastrointestinal biopsies (gastroenterologist) or prostate biopsies (urologist). The experience gained by undergoing these procedures had minimal impact on understanding the pathologists’ role, since they were identified as ultimate diagnosis makers by the minority of these patients (13.8%–36.4%). The integration of pathologist–interactions into patient care may be a potential solution with benefits beyond improved perceptions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8606462/ /pubmed/33097589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Report Fischer, Gabor Anderson, Leslie Ranson, Marc Sellen, David McArthur, Eric Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title | Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title_full | Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title_fullStr | Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title_full_unstemmed | Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title_short | Public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
title_sort | public perceptions on pathology: a fundamental change is required |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischergabor publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired AT andersonleslie publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired AT ransonmarc publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired AT sellendavid publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired AT mcarthureric publicperceptionsonpathologyafundamentalchangeisrequired |