Cargando…

Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England; describe and classify the associated patient safety incidents and generate suggestions to mitigate risks of ameliorable factors contributing to the incidents. DESIGN: Retrospective case note review. Patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avery, Anthony J, Sheehan, Christina, Bell, Brian, Armstrong, Sarah, Ashcroft, Darren M, Boyd, Matthew J, Chuter, Antony, Cooper, Alison, Donnelly, Ailsa, Edwards, Adrian, Evans, Huw Prosser, Hellard, Stuart, Lymn, Joanne, Mehta, Rajnikant, Rodgers, Sarah, Sheikh, Aziz, Smith, Pam, Williams, Huw, Campbell, Stephen M, Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011405
_version_ 1784602343984070656
author Avery, Anthony J
Sheehan, Christina
Bell, Brian
Armstrong, Sarah
Ashcroft, Darren M
Boyd, Matthew J
Chuter, Antony
Cooper, Alison
Donnelly, Ailsa
Edwards, Adrian
Evans, Huw Prosser
Hellard, Stuart
Lymn, Joanne
Mehta, Rajnikant
Rodgers, Sarah
Sheikh, Aziz
Smith, Pam
Williams, Huw
Campbell, Stephen M
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
author_facet Avery, Anthony J
Sheehan, Christina
Bell, Brian
Armstrong, Sarah
Ashcroft, Darren M
Boyd, Matthew J
Chuter, Antony
Cooper, Alison
Donnelly, Ailsa
Edwards, Adrian
Evans, Huw Prosser
Hellard, Stuart
Lymn, Joanne
Mehta, Rajnikant
Rodgers, Sarah
Sheikh, Aziz
Smith, Pam
Williams, Huw
Campbell, Stephen M
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
author_sort Avery, Anthony J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England; describe and classify the associated patient safety incidents and generate suggestions to mitigate risks of ameliorable factors contributing to the incidents. DESIGN: Retrospective case note review. Patients with significant health problems were identified and clinical judgements were made on avoidability and severity of harm. Factors contributing to avoidable harm were identified and recorded. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen general practitioners (GPs) undertook a retrospective case note review of a sample of 14 407 primary care patients registered with 12 randomly selected general practices from three regions in England (total list size: 92 255 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of significant harm considered at least ‘probably avoidable’ and the nature of the safety incidents. RESULTS: The rate of significant harm considered at least probably avoidable was 35.6 (95% CI 23.3 to 48.0) per 100 000 patient-years (57.9, 95% CI 42.2 to 73.7, per 100 000 based on a sensitivity analysis). Overall, 74 cases of avoidable harm were detected, involving 72 patients. Three types of incident accounted for more than 90% of the problems: problems with diagnosis accounted for 45/74 (60.8%) primary incidents, followed by medication-related problems (n=19, 25.7%) and delayed referrals (n=8, 10.8%). In 59 (79.7%) cases, the significant harm could have been identified sooner (n=48) or prevented (n=11) if the GP had taken actions aligned with evidence-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: There is likely to be a substantial burden of avoidable significant harm attributable to primary care in England with diagnostic error accounting for most harms. Based on the contributory factors we found, improvements could be made through more effective implementation of existing information technology, enhanced team coordination and communication, and greater personal and informational continuity of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86064642021-12-03 Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review Avery, Anthony J Sheehan, Christina Bell, Brian Armstrong, Sarah Ashcroft, Darren M Boyd, Matthew J Chuter, Antony Cooper, Alison Donnelly, Ailsa Edwards, Adrian Evans, Huw Prosser Hellard, Stuart Lymn, Joanne Mehta, Rajnikant Rodgers, Sarah Sheikh, Aziz Smith, Pam Williams, Huw Campbell, Stephen M Carson-Stevens, Andrew BMJ Qual Saf Original Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England; describe and classify the associated patient safety incidents and generate suggestions to mitigate risks of ameliorable factors contributing to the incidents. DESIGN: Retrospective case note review. Patients with significant health problems were identified and clinical judgements were made on avoidability and severity of harm. Factors contributing to avoidable harm were identified and recorded. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen general practitioners (GPs) undertook a retrospective case note review of a sample of 14 407 primary care patients registered with 12 randomly selected general practices from three regions in England (total list size: 92 255 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of significant harm considered at least ‘probably avoidable’ and the nature of the safety incidents. RESULTS: The rate of significant harm considered at least probably avoidable was 35.6 (95% CI 23.3 to 48.0) per 100 000 patient-years (57.9, 95% CI 42.2 to 73.7, per 100 000 based on a sensitivity analysis). Overall, 74 cases of avoidable harm were detected, involving 72 patients. Three types of incident accounted for more than 90% of the problems: problems with diagnosis accounted for 45/74 (60.8%) primary incidents, followed by medication-related problems (n=19, 25.7%) and delayed referrals (n=8, 10.8%). In 59 (79.7%) cases, the significant harm could have been identified sooner (n=48) or prevented (n=11) if the GP had taken actions aligned with evidence-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: There is likely to be a substantial burden of avoidable significant harm attributable to primary care in England with diagnostic error accounting for most harms. Based on the contributory factors we found, improvements could be made through more effective implementation of existing information technology, enhanced team coordination and communication, and greater personal and informational continuity of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8606464/ /pubmed/33172907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011405 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Avery, Anthony J
Sheehan, Christina
Bell, Brian
Armstrong, Sarah
Ashcroft, Darren M
Boyd, Matthew J
Chuter, Antony
Cooper, Alison
Donnelly, Ailsa
Edwards, Adrian
Evans, Huw Prosser
Hellard, Stuart
Lymn, Joanne
Mehta, Rajnikant
Rodgers, Sarah
Sheikh, Aziz
Smith, Pam
Williams, Huw
Campbell, Stephen M
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title_full Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title_fullStr Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title_short Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
title_sort incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in england: retrospective case note review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011405
work_keys_str_mv AT averyanthonyj incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT sheehanchristina incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT bellbrian incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT armstrongsarah incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT ashcroftdarrenm incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT boydmatthewj incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT chuterantony incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT cooperalison incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT donnellyailsa incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT edwardsadrian incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT evanshuwprosser incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT hellardstuart incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT lymnjoanne incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT mehtarajnikant incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT rodgerssarah incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT sheikhaziz incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT smithpam incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT williamshuw incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT campbellstephenm incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview
AT carsonstevensandrew incidencenatureandcausesofavoidablesignificantharminprimarycareinenglandretrospectivecasenotereview