Cargando…
A Systematic Review Examining the Approaches Used to Estimate Interindividual Differences in Trainability and Classify Individual Responses to Exercise Training
Background: Many reports describe statistical approaches for estimating interindividual differences in trainability and classifying individuals as “responders” or “non-responders.” The extent to which studies in the exercise training literature have adopted these statistical approaches remains uncle...
Autores principales: | Bonafiglia, Jacob T., Preobrazenski, Nicholas, Gurd, Brendon J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.665044 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO(2max) responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bonafiglia, Jacob T., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
An appraisal of the SD(IR) as an estimate of true individual differences in training responsiveness in parallel‐arm exercise randomized controlled trials
por: Bonafiglia, Jacob T., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Moving beyond threshold‐based dichotomous classification to improve the accuracy in classifying non‐responders
por: Bonafiglia, Jacob T., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A Multi-Center Comparison of [Image: see text] O(2peak) Trainability Between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training
por: Williams, Camilla J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Issues on Trainability
por: Radak, Zsolt, et al.
Publicado: (2022)