Cargando…

Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy

Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takaoka, Taiki, Tomita, Natsuo, Mizuno, Tomoki, Hashimoto, Shingo, Tsuchiya, Takahiro, Tomida, Masashi, Yanagi, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211060170
_version_ 1784602394570522624
author Takaoka, Taiki
Tomita, Natsuo
Mizuno, Tomoki
Hashimoto, Shingo
Tsuchiya, Takahiro
Tomida, Masashi
Yanagi, Takeshi
author_facet Takaoka, Taiki
Tomita, Natsuo
Mizuno, Tomoki
Hashimoto, Shingo
Tsuchiya, Takahiro
Tomida, Masashi
Yanagi, Takeshi
author_sort Takaoka, Taiki
collection PubMed
description Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86067192021-11-23 Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy Takaoka, Taiki Tomita, Natsuo Mizuno, Tomoki Hashimoto, Shingo Tsuchiya, Takahiro Tomida, Masashi Yanagi, Takeshi Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia. SAGE Publications 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8606719/ /pubmed/34806489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211060170 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Takaoka, Taiki
Tomita, Natsuo
Mizuno, Tomoki
Hashimoto, Shingo
Tsuchiya, Takahiro
Tomida, Masashi
Yanagi, Takeshi
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title_full Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title_short Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
title_sort dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy in hippocampus- and scalp-sparing whole brain radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211060170
work_keys_str_mv AT takaokataiki dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT tomitanatsuo dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT mizunotomoki dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT hashimotoshingo dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT tsuchiyatakahiro dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT tomidamasashi dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy
AT yanagitakeshi dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy