Cargando…

Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-140...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Socinski, Mark A., Waller, Cornelius F., Idris, Tazeen, Bondarenko, Igor, Luft, Alexander, Beckmann, Katrin, Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini, Loganathan, Subramanian, Donnelly, Charles, Hummel, Matthew A., Shapiro, Roxann, Woods, Melody, Rao, Anita, Nayak, Vivek G, Ranganna, Gopinath, Barve, Abhijit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045845
_version_ 1784602397587275776
author Socinski, Mark A.
Waller, Cornelius F.
Idris, Tazeen
Bondarenko, Igor
Luft, Alexander
Beckmann, Katrin
Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini
Loganathan, Subramanian
Donnelly, Charles
Hummel, Matthew A.
Shapiro, Roxann
Woods, Melody
Rao, Anita
Nayak, Vivek G
Ranganna, Gopinath
Barve, Abhijit
author_facet Socinski, Mark A.
Waller, Cornelius F.
Idris, Tazeen
Bondarenko, Igor
Luft, Alexander
Beckmann, Katrin
Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini
Loganathan, Subramanian
Donnelly, Charles
Hummel, Matthew A.
Shapiro, Roxann
Woods, Melody
Rao, Anita
Nayak, Vivek G
Ranganna, Gopinath
Barve, Abhijit
author_sort Socinski, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-1402O or bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by up to 24 weeks (8 cycles) of bevacizumab monotherapy. The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. ORR was analyzed per US Food and Drug Administration (ratio of ORR) and European Medicines Agency (difference in ORRs) requirements for equivalence evaluation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, safety, and immunogenicity over a period of 42 weeks, and pharmacokinetics (up to 18 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 671 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. The ratio of ORR was 0.96 [confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR was −1.6 (CI −9.0, 5.9) between treatment arms; CIs were within the predefined equivalence margins. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity was transient, with no notable differences between treatment arms (6.5% versus 4.8% ADA positivity rate in MYL-1402O versus BEV, respectively). The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower in the MYL-1402O arm (0.6%) compared to the bevacizumab arm (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MYL-1402O is therapeutically equivalent to bevacizumab, based on the ORR analyses, with comparable secondary endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRY INFORMATION: EU Clinical Trials Register, Registration # EudraCT no. 2015-005141-32https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-005141-32 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Previous studies established bioequivalence of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O to reference bevacizumab. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, MYL-1402O (n = 337) demonstrated comparable efficacy to bevacizumab (n = 334) in treating advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer per Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency requirements for equivalence; the ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 0.96 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR (MYL-1402O:bevacizumab) was −1.6 (95% CI −9.0, 5.9). Median progression-free survival at 42 weeks was comparable: 7.6 (7.0, 9.5) with MYL-1402O versus 9.0 (7.2, 9.7) months (p = 0.0906) with bevacizumab, by independent review. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death (2.4% vs 1.5%), serious adverse events (17.6% vs 16.7%), and antidrug antibodies (6.5% vs 4.8%), were comparable in the MYL-1402O vs bevacizumab arms, respectively. The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower with MYL-1402O (0.6%) than with bevacizumab (2.5%). These findings confirm therapeutic equivalence of MYL-1402O to bevacizumab, providing opportunities for improving access to bevacizumab.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86067312021-11-23 Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer Socinski, Mark A. Waller, Cornelius F. Idris, Tazeen Bondarenko, Igor Luft, Alexander Beckmann, Katrin Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini Loganathan, Subramanian Donnelly, Charles Hummel, Matthew A. Shapiro, Roxann Woods, Melody Rao, Anita Nayak, Vivek G Ranganna, Gopinath Barve, Abhijit Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-1402O or bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by up to 24 weeks (8 cycles) of bevacizumab monotherapy. The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. ORR was analyzed per US Food and Drug Administration (ratio of ORR) and European Medicines Agency (difference in ORRs) requirements for equivalence evaluation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, safety, and immunogenicity over a period of 42 weeks, and pharmacokinetics (up to 18 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 671 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. The ratio of ORR was 0.96 [confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR was −1.6 (CI −9.0, 5.9) between treatment arms; CIs were within the predefined equivalence margins. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity was transient, with no notable differences between treatment arms (6.5% versus 4.8% ADA positivity rate in MYL-1402O versus BEV, respectively). The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower in the MYL-1402O arm (0.6%) compared to the bevacizumab arm (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MYL-1402O is therapeutically equivalent to bevacizumab, based on the ORR analyses, with comparable secondary endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRY INFORMATION: EU Clinical Trials Register, Registration # EudraCT no. 2015-005141-32https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-005141-32 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Previous studies established bioequivalence of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O to reference bevacizumab. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, MYL-1402O (n = 337) demonstrated comparable efficacy to bevacizumab (n = 334) in treating advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer per Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency requirements for equivalence; the ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 0.96 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR (MYL-1402O:bevacizumab) was −1.6 (95% CI −9.0, 5.9). Median progression-free survival at 42 weeks was comparable: 7.6 (7.0, 9.5) with MYL-1402O versus 9.0 (7.2, 9.7) months (p = 0.0906) with bevacizumab, by independent review. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death (2.4% vs 1.5%), serious adverse events (17.6% vs 16.7%), and antidrug antibodies (6.5% vs 4.8%), were comparable in the MYL-1402O vs bevacizumab arms, respectively. The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower with MYL-1402O (0.6%) than with bevacizumab (2.5%). These findings confirm therapeutic equivalence of MYL-1402O to bevacizumab, providing opportunities for improving access to bevacizumab. SAGE Publications 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8606731/ /pubmed/34819997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045845 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Socinski, Mark A.
Waller, Cornelius F.
Idris, Tazeen
Bondarenko, Igor
Luft, Alexander
Beckmann, Katrin
Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini
Loganathan, Subramanian
Donnelly, Charles
Hummel, Matthew A.
Shapiro, Roxann
Woods, Melody
Rao, Anita
Nayak, Vivek G
Ranganna, Gopinath
Barve, Abhijit
Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_short Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_sort phase iii double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar myl-1402o and reference bevacizumab in stage iv non-small-cell lung cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045845
work_keys_str_mv AT socinskimarka phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT wallercorneliusf phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT idristazeen phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT bondarenkoigor phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT luftalexander phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT beckmannkatrin phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT vishweswaramurthyashwini phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT loganathansubramanian phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT donnellycharles phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hummelmatthewa phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shapiroroxann phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT woodsmelody phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT raoanita phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nayakvivekg phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rangannagopinath phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT barveabhijit phaseiiidoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofproposedbiosimilarmyl1402oandreferencebevacizumabinstageivnonsmallcelllungcancer