Cargando…
Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data
Background: Current diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) are colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, which are invasive and complex procedures with possible complications. This study aimed to determine models for CRC identification that involve minimally invasive, affordable, portable, and accurate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211058352 |
_version_ | 1784602397834739712 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hui Lin, Jianmei Xiao, Yanhong Zheng, Wenwen Zhao, Lu Yang, Xiangling Zhong, Minsheng Liu, Huanliang |
author_facet | Li, Hui Lin, Jianmei Xiao, Yanhong Zheng, Wenwen Zhao, Lu Yang, Xiangling Zhong, Minsheng Liu, Huanliang |
author_sort | Li, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Current diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) are colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, which are invasive and complex procedures with possible complications. This study aimed to determine models for CRC identification that involve minimally invasive, affordable, portable, and accurate screening variables. Methods: This was a retrospective study that used data from electronic medical records of patients with CRC and healthy individuals between July 2017 and June 2018. Laboratory data, including liver enzymes, lipid profiles, complete blood counts, and tumor biomarkers, were extracted from the electronic medical records. Five machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine [SVM], and naïve Bayes) were used to identify CRC. The performances were evaluated using the areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV). Results: A total of 1164 electronic medical records (CRC patients: 582; healthy controls: 582) were included. The logistic regression model achieved the highest performance in identifying CRC (AUC: 0.865, sensitivity: 89.5%, specificity: 83.5%, PPV: 84.4%, NPV: 88.9%). The first four weighted features in the model were carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), hemoglobin (HGB), lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). A diagnostic model for CRC was established based on the four indicators, with an AUC of 0.849 (0.840-0.860) for identifying all CRC patients, and it performed best in discriminating patients with late colon cancer from healthy individuals with an AUC of 0.905 (0.889-0.929). Conclusions: The logistic regression model based on CEA, HGB, Lp(a), and HDL might be a powerful, noninvasive, and cost-effective method to identify CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8606732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86067322021-11-23 Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data Li, Hui Lin, Jianmei Xiao, Yanhong Zheng, Wenwen Zhao, Lu Yang, Xiangling Zhong, Minsheng Liu, Huanliang Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Background: Current diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) are colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, which are invasive and complex procedures with possible complications. This study aimed to determine models for CRC identification that involve minimally invasive, affordable, portable, and accurate screening variables. Methods: This was a retrospective study that used data from electronic medical records of patients with CRC and healthy individuals between July 2017 and June 2018. Laboratory data, including liver enzymes, lipid profiles, complete blood counts, and tumor biomarkers, were extracted from the electronic medical records. Five machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine [SVM], and naïve Bayes) were used to identify CRC. The performances were evaluated using the areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV). Results: A total of 1164 electronic medical records (CRC patients: 582; healthy controls: 582) were included. The logistic regression model achieved the highest performance in identifying CRC (AUC: 0.865, sensitivity: 89.5%, specificity: 83.5%, PPV: 84.4%, NPV: 88.9%). The first four weighted features in the model were carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), hemoglobin (HGB), lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). A diagnostic model for CRC was established based on the four indicators, with an AUC of 0.849 (0.840-0.860) for identifying all CRC patients, and it performed best in discriminating patients with late colon cancer from healthy individuals with an AUC of 0.905 (0.889-0.929). Conclusions: The logistic regression model based on CEA, HGB, Lp(a), and HDL might be a powerful, noninvasive, and cost-effective method to identify CRC. SAGE Publications 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8606732/ /pubmed/34806496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211058352 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Hui Lin, Jianmei Xiao, Yanhong Zheng, Wenwen Zhao, Lu Yang, Xiangling Zhong, Minsheng Liu, Huanliang Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title | Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title_full | Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title_fullStr | Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title_short | Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data |
title_sort | colorectal cancer detected by machine learning models using conventional laboratory test data |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211058352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihui colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT linjianmei colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT xiaoyanhong colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT zhengwenwen colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT zhaolu colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT yangxiangling colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT zhongminsheng colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata AT liuhuanliang colorectalcancerdetectedbymachinelearningmodelsusingconventionallaboratorytestdata |