Cargando…

Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials

INTRODUCTION: A major change in the ethics framework for preventive HIV vaccine trials worldwide is the release of the UNAIDS 2021 ethical considerations in HIV prevention trials. This new guidance comes at an exciting time when there are multiple HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the field. Research E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slack, Catherine, Ndebele, Paul, Allen, Mary, Salzwedel, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25796
_version_ 1784602427012415488
author Slack, Catherine
Ndebele, Paul
Allen, Mary
Salzwedel, Jessica
author_facet Slack, Catherine
Ndebele, Paul
Allen, Mary
Salzwedel, Jessica
author_sort Slack, Catherine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A major change in the ethics framework for preventive HIV vaccine trials worldwide is the release of the UNAIDS 2021 ethical considerations in HIV prevention trials. This new guidance comes at an exciting time when there are multiple HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the field. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards are a most likely audience for these guidelines. Our objective is to highlight shifts in ethics recommendations from the earlier 2012 UNAIDS guidance. DISCUSSION: We review recommendations related to four key issues, namely standard of prevention, post‐trial access to safe and effective vaccines, enrolment of adolescents and enrolment of pregnant women. We outline implications and make recommendations for the ethics review process, including suggested lines of inquiry by RECs and responses by applicants. CONCLUSIONS: There have been several shifts in the UNAIDS ethics guidance with implications for HIV vaccine researchers submitting applications for initial ethics review or re‐certification, and for RECs conducting such reviews. This review may assist RECs in a more efficient and consistent application of ethics recommendations. However, additional tools and training may further help stakeholders comply with new UNAIDS ethics recommendations during protocol development and ethics review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8606858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86068582021-11-29 Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials Slack, Catherine Ndebele, Paul Allen, Mary Salzwedel, Jessica J Int AIDS Soc Supplement: Commentary INTRODUCTION: A major change in the ethics framework for preventive HIV vaccine trials worldwide is the release of the UNAIDS 2021 ethical considerations in HIV prevention trials. This new guidance comes at an exciting time when there are multiple HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the field. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards are a most likely audience for these guidelines. Our objective is to highlight shifts in ethics recommendations from the earlier 2012 UNAIDS guidance. DISCUSSION: We review recommendations related to four key issues, namely standard of prevention, post‐trial access to safe and effective vaccines, enrolment of adolescents and enrolment of pregnant women. We outline implications and make recommendations for the ethics review process, including suggested lines of inquiry by RECs and responses by applicants. CONCLUSIONS: There have been several shifts in the UNAIDS ethics guidance with implications for HIV vaccine researchers submitting applications for initial ethics review or re‐certification, and for RECs conducting such reviews. This review may assist RECs in a more efficient and consistent application of ethics recommendations. However, additional tools and training may further help stakeholders comply with new UNAIDS ethics recommendations during protocol development and ethics review. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8606858/ /pubmed/34806302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25796 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement: Commentary
Slack, Catherine
Ndebele, Paul
Allen, Mary
Salzwedel, Jessica
Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title_full Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title_fullStr Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title_full_unstemmed Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title_short Shifts in UNAIDS ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive HIV vaccine trials
title_sort shifts in unaids ethics guidance and implications for ethics review of preventive hiv vaccine trials
topic Supplement: Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25796
work_keys_str_mv AT slackcatherine shiftsinunaidsethicsguidanceandimplicationsforethicsreviewofpreventivehivvaccinetrials
AT ndebelepaul shiftsinunaidsethicsguidanceandimplicationsforethicsreviewofpreventivehivvaccinetrials
AT allenmary shiftsinunaidsethicsguidanceandimplicationsforethicsreviewofpreventivehivvaccinetrials
AT salzwedeljessica shiftsinunaidsethicsguidanceandimplicationsforethicsreviewofpreventivehivvaccinetrials