Cargando…
Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges in quantitative analysis because voxel intensity values lack physical meaning. While intensity standardization methods exist, their effects on head and neck MRI have not been investigated. We developed a workflow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001 |
_version_ | 1784602571520868352 |
---|---|
author | Wahid, Kareem A. He, Renjie McDonald, Brigid A. Anderson, Brian M. Salzillo, Travis Mulder, Sam Wang, Jarey Sharafi, Christina Setareh McCoy, Lance A. Naser, Mohamed A. Ahmed, Sara Sanders, Keith L. Mohamed, Abdallah S.R. Ding, Yao Wang, Jihong Hutcheson, Kate Lai, Stephen Y. Fuller, Clifton D. van Dijk, Lisanne V. |
author_facet | Wahid, Kareem A. He, Renjie McDonald, Brigid A. Anderson, Brian M. Salzillo, Travis Mulder, Sam Wang, Jarey Sharafi, Christina Setareh McCoy, Lance A. Naser, Mohamed A. Ahmed, Sara Sanders, Keith L. Mohamed, Abdallah S.R. Ding, Yao Wang, Jihong Hutcheson, Kate Lai, Stephen Y. Fuller, Clifton D. van Dijk, Lisanne V. |
author_sort | Wahid, Kareem A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges in quantitative analysis because voxel intensity values lack physical meaning. While intensity standardization methods exist, their effects on head and neck MRI have not been investigated. We developed a workflow based on healthy tissue region of interest (ROI) analysis to determine intensity consistency within a patient cohort. Through this workflow, we systematically evaluated intensity standardization methods for MRI of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two HNC cohorts (30 patients total) were retrospectively analyzed. One cohort was imaged with heterogenous acquisition parameters (HET cohort), whereas the other was imaged with homogenous acquisition parameters (HOM cohort). The standard deviation of cohort-level normalized mean intensity (SD NMI(c)), a metric of intensity consistency, was calculated across ROIs to determine the effect of five intensity standardization methods on T2-weighted images. For each cohort, a Friedman test followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare SD NMI(c) among methods. RESULTS: Consistency (SD NMI(c) across ROIs) between unstandardized images was substantially more impaired in the HET cohort (0.29 ± 0.08) than in the HOM cohort (0.15 ± 0.03). Consequently, corrected p-values for intensity standardization methods with lower SD NMI(c) compared to unstandardized images were significant in the HET cohort (p < 0.05) but not significant in the HOM cohort (p > 0.05). In both cohorts, differences between methods were often minimal and nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings stress the importance of intensity standardization, either through the utilization of uniform acquisition parameters or specific intensity standardization methods, and the need for testing intensity consistency before performing quantitative analysis of HNC MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8607477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86074772021-11-29 Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer Wahid, Kareem A. He, Renjie McDonald, Brigid A. Anderson, Brian M. Salzillo, Travis Mulder, Sam Wang, Jarey Sharafi, Christina Setareh McCoy, Lance A. Naser, Mohamed A. Ahmed, Sara Sanders, Keith L. Mohamed, Abdallah S.R. Ding, Yao Wang, Jihong Hutcheson, Kate Lai, Stephen Y. Fuller, Clifton D. van Dijk, Lisanne V. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges in quantitative analysis because voxel intensity values lack physical meaning. While intensity standardization methods exist, their effects on head and neck MRI have not been investigated. We developed a workflow based on healthy tissue region of interest (ROI) analysis to determine intensity consistency within a patient cohort. Through this workflow, we systematically evaluated intensity standardization methods for MRI of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two HNC cohorts (30 patients total) were retrospectively analyzed. One cohort was imaged with heterogenous acquisition parameters (HET cohort), whereas the other was imaged with homogenous acquisition parameters (HOM cohort). The standard deviation of cohort-level normalized mean intensity (SD NMI(c)), a metric of intensity consistency, was calculated across ROIs to determine the effect of five intensity standardization methods on T2-weighted images. For each cohort, a Friedman test followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare SD NMI(c) among methods. RESULTS: Consistency (SD NMI(c) across ROIs) between unstandardized images was substantially more impaired in the HET cohort (0.29 ± 0.08) than in the HOM cohort (0.15 ± 0.03). Consequently, corrected p-values for intensity standardization methods with lower SD NMI(c) compared to unstandardized images were significant in the HET cohort (p < 0.05) but not significant in the HOM cohort (p > 0.05). In both cohorts, differences between methods were often minimal and nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings stress the importance of intensity standardization, either through the utilization of uniform acquisition parameters or specific intensity standardization methods, and the need for testing intensity consistency before performing quantitative analysis of HNC MRI. Elsevier 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8607477/ /pubmed/34849414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Wahid, Kareem A. He, Renjie McDonald, Brigid A. Anderson, Brian M. Salzillo, Travis Mulder, Sam Wang, Jarey Sharafi, Christina Setareh McCoy, Lance A. Naser, Mohamed A. Ahmed, Sara Sanders, Keith L. Mohamed, Abdallah S.R. Ding, Yao Wang, Jihong Hutcheson, Kate Lai, Stephen Y. Fuller, Clifton D. van Dijk, Lisanne V. Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title | Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title_full | Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title_fullStr | Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title_short | Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
title_sort | intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wahidkareema intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT herenjie intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT mcdonaldbrigida intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT andersonbrianm intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT salzillotravis intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT muldersam intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT wangjarey intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT sharafichristinasetareh intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT mccoylancea intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT nasermohameda intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT ahmedsara intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT sanderskeithl intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT mohamedabdallahsr intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT dingyao intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT wangjihong intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT hutchesonkate intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT laistepheny intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT fullercliftond intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer AT vandijklisannev intensitystandardizationmethodsinmagneticresonanceimagingofheadandneckcancer |