Cargando…

Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Qing-hao, Li, Peng-biao, Lu, Ting-ting, Guo, Shi-fang, Di, Wen-fei, Yang, Ke-hu, Qian, Yao-wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02806-7
_version_ 1784602590304010240
author Cheng, Qing-hao
Li, Peng-biao
Lu, Ting-ting
Guo, Shi-fang
Di, Wen-fei
Yang, Ke-hu
Qian, Yao-wen
author_facet Cheng, Qing-hao
Li, Peng-biao
Lu, Ting-ting
Guo, Shi-fang
Di, Wen-fei
Yang, Ke-hu
Qian, Yao-wen
author_sort Cheng, Qing-hao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database from the beginning to August 2020. RevMan5.4 software, which was provided by the International Cochrane Group, was used for the meta-analysis comparing the differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, total drilling times, Harris score, fracture healing rate, and femoral head necrosis rate between computer-assisted and traditional methods groups. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included in 16 studies. Primary outcome indicators: Compared with the traditional method group, the computer-assisted group had less operative time (2RCTs, P < 0.00001; 8 non-RCTs, P = 0.009; Overall, P < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (1 RCTs, P < 0.00001; 9non-RCTs, P < 0.00001; Overall, P < 0.00001), femoral head necrosis rate (1 RCT, P = 0.11;7 non-RCTs, P = 0.09; Overall, P = 0.02) and higher Harris scores (1 RCT, P < 0.0001; 9 non-RCTs, P = 0.0002; Overall, P < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in fracture healing rate between the two groups (5 non-RCTs, P = 0.17). Secondary outcomes indicators: The computer-assisted group had a lower frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and total number of drills compared with the traditional method group, while there was no significant difference in fracture healing time. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional hollow screw internal fixation on the treatment of femoral neck fracture, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can shorten the operation time and improve the operation efficiency and reduce the X-ray injury of medical staff and help patients obtain a better prognosis. Therefore, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a better choice for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42020214493. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02806-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8607593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86075932021-11-22 Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cheng, Qing-hao Li, Peng-biao Lu, Ting-ting Guo, Shi-fang Di, Wen-fei Yang, Ke-hu Qian, Yao-wen J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database from the beginning to August 2020. RevMan5.4 software, which was provided by the International Cochrane Group, was used for the meta-analysis comparing the differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, total drilling times, Harris score, fracture healing rate, and femoral head necrosis rate between computer-assisted and traditional methods groups. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included in 16 studies. Primary outcome indicators: Compared with the traditional method group, the computer-assisted group had less operative time (2RCTs, P < 0.00001; 8 non-RCTs, P = 0.009; Overall, P < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (1 RCTs, P < 0.00001; 9non-RCTs, P < 0.00001; Overall, P < 0.00001), femoral head necrosis rate (1 RCT, P = 0.11;7 non-RCTs, P = 0.09; Overall, P = 0.02) and higher Harris scores (1 RCT, P < 0.0001; 9 non-RCTs, P = 0.0002; Overall, P < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in fracture healing rate between the two groups (5 non-RCTs, P = 0.17). Secondary outcomes indicators: The computer-assisted group had a lower frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and total number of drills compared with the traditional method group, while there was no significant difference in fracture healing time. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional hollow screw internal fixation on the treatment of femoral neck fracture, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can shorten the operation time and improve the operation efficiency and reduce the X-ray injury of medical staff and help patients obtain a better prognosis. Therefore, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a better choice for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42020214493. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02806-7. BioMed Central 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8607593/ /pubmed/34809649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02806-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cheng, Qing-hao
Li, Peng-biao
Lu, Ting-ting
Guo, Shi-fang
Di, Wen-fei
Yang, Ke-hu
Qian, Yao-wen
Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02806-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chengqinghao computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lipengbiao computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lutingting computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guoshifang computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diwenfei computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkehu computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianyaowen computerassistedcannulatedscrewinternalfixationversusconventionalcannulatedscrewinternalfixationforfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis