Cargando…

Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists

The incremental exercise test is the most common method in assessing the maximal fat oxidation (MFO) rate. The main aim of the study was to determine whether the progressive linear RAMP test can be used to assess the maximal fat oxidation rate along with the intensities that trigger its maximal (FAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalik, Kamil, Danek, Natalia, Zatoń, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868426
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0104
_version_ 1784602627647995904
author Michalik, Kamil
Danek, Natalia
Zatoń, Marek
author_facet Michalik, Kamil
Danek, Natalia
Zatoń, Marek
author_sort Michalik, Kamil
collection PubMed
description The incremental exercise test is the most common method in assessing the maximal fat oxidation (MFO) rate. The main aim of the study was to determine whether the progressive linear RAMP test can be used to assess the maximal fat oxidation rate along with the intensities that trigger its maximal (FAT(max)) and its minimal (FAT(min)) values. Our study comprised 57 young road cyclists who were tested in random order. Each of them was submitted to two incremental exercise tests on an electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometer - STEP (50 W·3 min(-1)) and RAMP (~0.278 W·s(-1)) at a 7-day interval. A stoichiometric equation was used to calculate the fat oxidation rate, while the metabolic thresholds were defined by analyzing ventilation gases. The Student’s T-test, Bland-Altman plots and Pearson’s linear correlations were resorted to in the process of statistical analysis. No statistically significant MFO variances occurred between the tests (p = 0.12) and its rate amounted to 0.57 ± 0.15 g·min(-1) and 0.53 ± 0.17 g·min(-1) in the STEP and RAMP, respectively. No statistically significant variances in the absolute and relative (to maximal) values of oxygen uptake and heart rate were discerned at the FAT(max) and FAT(min) intensities. The RAMP test displayed very strong oxygen uptake correlations between the aerobic threshold and FAT(max) (r = 0.93, R(2) = 0.87, p < 0.001) as well as the anaerobic threshold and FAT(min) (r = 0.88, R(2) = 0.78, p < 0.001). Our results corroborate our hypothesis that the incremental RAMP test as well as the STEP test are reliable tools in assessing MFO, FAT(max) and FAT(min) intensities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8607772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86077722021-12-02 Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists Michalik, Kamil Danek, Natalia Zatoń, Marek J Hum Kinet Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine The incremental exercise test is the most common method in assessing the maximal fat oxidation (MFO) rate. The main aim of the study was to determine whether the progressive linear RAMP test can be used to assess the maximal fat oxidation rate along with the intensities that trigger its maximal (FAT(max)) and its minimal (FAT(min)) values. Our study comprised 57 young road cyclists who were tested in random order. Each of them was submitted to two incremental exercise tests on an electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometer - STEP (50 W·3 min(-1)) and RAMP (~0.278 W·s(-1)) at a 7-day interval. A stoichiometric equation was used to calculate the fat oxidation rate, while the metabolic thresholds were defined by analyzing ventilation gases. The Student’s T-test, Bland-Altman plots and Pearson’s linear correlations were resorted to in the process of statistical analysis. No statistically significant MFO variances occurred between the tests (p = 0.12) and its rate amounted to 0.57 ± 0.15 g·min(-1) and 0.53 ± 0.17 g·min(-1) in the STEP and RAMP, respectively. No statistically significant variances in the absolute and relative (to maximal) values of oxygen uptake and heart rate were discerned at the FAT(max) and FAT(min) intensities. The RAMP test displayed very strong oxygen uptake correlations between the aerobic threshold and FAT(max) (r = 0.93, R(2) = 0.87, p < 0.001) as well as the anaerobic threshold and FAT(min) (r = 0.88, R(2) = 0.78, p < 0.001). Our results corroborate our hypothesis that the incremental RAMP test as well as the STEP test are reliable tools in assessing MFO, FAT(max) and FAT(min) intensities. Sciendo 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8607772/ /pubmed/34868426 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0104 Text en © 2021 Kamil Michalik, Natalia Danek, Marek Zatoń, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
Michalik, Kamil
Danek, Natalia
Zatoń, Marek
Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title_full Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title_fullStr Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title_short Comparison of the Ramp and Step Incremental Exercise Test Protocols in Assessing the Maximal Fat Oxidation Rate in Youth Cyclists
title_sort comparison of the ramp and step incremental exercise test protocols in assessing the maximal fat oxidation rate in youth cyclists
topic Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868426
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0104
work_keys_str_mv AT michalikkamil comparisonoftherampandstepincrementalexercisetestprotocolsinassessingthemaximalfatoxidationrateinyouthcyclists
AT daneknatalia comparisonoftherampandstepincrementalexercisetestprotocolsinassessingthemaximalfatoxidationrateinyouthcyclists
AT zatonmarek comparisonoftherampandstepincrementalexercisetestprotocolsinassessingthemaximalfatoxidationrateinyouthcyclists