Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking ces...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877438 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077 |
_version_ | 1784602659431383040 |
---|---|
author | Quigley, Joan M. Walsh, Cathal Lee, Caitriona Long, Jean Kennelly, Helen McCarthy, Anne Kavanagh, Paul |
author_facet | Quigley, Joan M. Walsh, Cathal Lee, Caitriona Long, Jean Kennelly, Helen McCarthy, Anne Kavanagh, Paul |
author_sort | Quigley, Joan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking cessation comparator treatment or combination of treatments at 24–26 weeks and at 52 weeks. METHODS: Systematic review techniques involved searches of three databases in February 2020 with update searches run on 14 May 2021, two-person independent screening, two-person independent assessment of bias, formal extraction of data with verification by a second person, a feasibility assessment to decide if meta-analysis was appropriate, and network meta-analysis (NMA) of data at 24–26 weeks. Data at 52 weeks were narratively summarized. RESULTS: Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, eight for efficacy and ten for safety. Eight of the nine RCTs were assessed as at high risk of bias. The sample sizes of the RCTs were 30–2012. Using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as the reference treatment, the incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks were comparable between ENDS and NRT groups (RR=1.17; 95% CrI: 0.66–1.86). Three sensitivity analyses were carried out indicating the main findings for 24–26 weeks were robust to assumptions. The findings at 52 weeks were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and NMA indicates that there is no clear evidence of a difference in effect between nicotine containing e-cigarettes and NRT on incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks, and substantial uncertainty remains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8607936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86079362021-12-06 Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Quigley, Joan M. Walsh, Cathal Lee, Caitriona Long, Jean Kennelly, Helen McCarthy, Anne Kavanagh, Paul Tob Prev Cessat Review Paper INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking cessation comparator treatment or combination of treatments at 24–26 weeks and at 52 weeks. METHODS: Systematic review techniques involved searches of three databases in February 2020 with update searches run on 14 May 2021, two-person independent screening, two-person independent assessment of bias, formal extraction of data with verification by a second person, a feasibility assessment to decide if meta-analysis was appropriate, and network meta-analysis (NMA) of data at 24–26 weeks. Data at 52 weeks were narratively summarized. RESULTS: Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, eight for efficacy and ten for safety. Eight of the nine RCTs were assessed as at high risk of bias. The sample sizes of the RCTs were 30–2012. Using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as the reference treatment, the incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks were comparable between ENDS and NRT groups (RR=1.17; 95% CrI: 0.66–1.86). Three sensitivity analyses were carried out indicating the main findings for 24–26 weeks were robust to assumptions. The findings at 52 weeks were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and NMA indicates that there is no clear evidence of a difference in effect between nicotine containing e-cigarettes and NRT on incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks, and substantial uncertainty remains. European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP) 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8607936/ /pubmed/34877438 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077 Text en © 2021 Quigley J. M. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Quigley, Joan M. Walsh, Cathal Lee, Caitriona Long, Jean Kennelly, Helen McCarthy, Anne Kavanagh, Paul Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877438 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quigleyjoanm efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT walshcathal efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT leecaitriona efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT longjean efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kennellyhelen efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mccarthyanne efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kavanaghpaul efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |