Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking ces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quigley, Joan M., Walsh, Cathal, Lee, Caitriona, Long, Jean, Kennelly, Helen, McCarthy, Anne, Kavanagh, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877438
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077
_version_ 1784602659431383040
author Quigley, Joan M.
Walsh, Cathal
Lee, Caitriona
Long, Jean
Kennelly, Helen
McCarthy, Anne
Kavanagh, Paul
author_facet Quigley, Joan M.
Walsh, Cathal
Lee, Caitriona
Long, Jean
Kennelly, Helen
McCarthy, Anne
Kavanagh, Paul
author_sort Quigley, Joan M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking cessation comparator treatment or combination of treatments at 24–26 weeks and at 52 weeks. METHODS: Systematic review techniques involved searches of three databases in February 2020 with update searches run on 14 May 2021, two-person independent screening, two-person independent assessment of bias, formal extraction of data with verification by a second person, a feasibility assessment to decide if meta-analysis was appropriate, and network meta-analysis (NMA) of data at 24–26 weeks. Data at 52 weeks were narratively summarized. RESULTS: Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, eight for efficacy and ten for safety. Eight of the nine RCTs were assessed as at high risk of bias. The sample sizes of the RCTs were 30–2012. Using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as the reference treatment, the incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks were comparable between ENDS and NRT groups (RR=1.17; 95% CrI: 0.66–1.86). Three sensitivity analyses were carried out indicating the main findings for 24–26 weeks were robust to assumptions. The findings at 52 weeks were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and NMA indicates that there is no clear evidence of a difference in effect between nicotine containing e-cigarettes and NRT on incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks, and substantial uncertainty remains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8607936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86079362021-12-06 Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Quigley, Joan M. Walsh, Cathal Lee, Caitriona Long, Jean Kennelly, Helen McCarthy, Anne Kavanagh, Paul Tob Prev Cessat Review Paper INTRODUCTION: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, ENDS) in helping people who smoke to achieve abstinence compared with electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS, no nicotine) or any smoking cessation comparator treatment or combination of treatments at 24–26 weeks and at 52 weeks. METHODS: Systematic review techniques involved searches of three databases in February 2020 with update searches run on 14 May 2021, two-person independent screening, two-person independent assessment of bias, formal extraction of data with verification by a second person, a feasibility assessment to decide if meta-analysis was appropriate, and network meta-analysis (NMA) of data at 24–26 weeks. Data at 52 weeks were narratively summarized. RESULTS: Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, eight for efficacy and ten for safety. Eight of the nine RCTs were assessed as at high risk of bias. The sample sizes of the RCTs were 30–2012. Using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as the reference treatment, the incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks were comparable between ENDS and NRT groups (RR=1.17; 95% CrI: 0.66–1.86). Three sensitivity analyses were carried out indicating the main findings for 24–26 weeks were robust to assumptions. The findings at 52 weeks were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and NMA indicates that there is no clear evidence of a difference in effect between nicotine containing e-cigarettes and NRT on incidences of smoking cessation at 24–26 weeks, and substantial uncertainty remains. European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP) 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8607936/ /pubmed/34877438 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077 Text en © 2021 Quigley J. M. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Quigley, Joan M.
Walsh, Cathal
Lee, Caitriona
Long, Jean
Kennelly, Helen
McCarthy, Anne
Kavanagh, Paul
Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8607936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877438
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/143077
work_keys_str_mv AT quigleyjoanm efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT walshcathal efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT leecaitriona efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT longjean efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kennellyhelen efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mccarthyanne efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kavanaghpaul efficacyandsafetyofelectroniccigarettesasasmokingcessationinterventionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis