Cargando…

Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

Anticoagulation therapy is the first line and drug of choice for both the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism). Anticoagulation drugs, ranging from different preparations of heparin, warfarin, and newer direct oral drugs such as rivarox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, Peter, Visagan, Shakthi, Issa, Reem, Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh, Thomas, Sneha E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853735
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18992
_version_ 1784602714065338368
author Alexander, Peter
Visagan, Shakthi
Issa, Reem
Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh
Thomas, Sneha E
author_facet Alexander, Peter
Visagan, Shakthi
Issa, Reem
Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh
Thomas, Sneha E
author_sort Alexander, Peter
collection PubMed
description Anticoagulation therapy is the first line and drug of choice for both the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism). Anticoagulation drugs, ranging from different preparations of heparin, warfarin, and newer direct oral drugs such as rivaroxaban and dabigatran, work mainly by inhibiting important factors and enzymes in the coagulation cascade by preventing fibrin formation, platelet aggregation, and clot assembly. With recurrent thrombosis and embolisms being a feared complication for many physicians treating such cases, anticoagulation is often extended beyond the initial three- to six-month acute phase after an incident of venous thromboembolism. For some groups of patients, anticoagulation needs to be offered indefinitely to decrease the risk of a recurrent thrombosis. However, this concomitantly increases obvious and dangerous adverse effects such as increased risk of hemorrhage, as the ability to clot is hindered. This tradeoff between recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding is what underscores the controversy of the clinical question: for how long should anticoagulation be administered for venous thromboembolism? This review analyzes the use of anticoagulants in different types of venous thromboembolism and remarks on current consensus and trends on the length of anticoagulation treatment. We are doing so while acknowledging that venous thromboembolism management is an active area of research that is rapidly evolving. A literature search was performed looking at recent studies on anticoagulant administration for the treatment of venous thromboembolism with a focus on varying durations and patient populations. Factors that affect clinical decisions of duration are also elucidated. The most clinically relevant anticoagulants were discussed and their effects on the risk of recurrent thrombosis and embolism, and the risk of bleeding in relation to other drugs were analyzed. Ultimately, this article discussed patterns of anticoagulant treatments duration and which patient groups are likely to benefit the most from certain durations, shedding light on the ambiguity in how physicians should approach administering anticoagulation therapy over time for a broad range of presentations of venous thromboembolism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8608253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86082532021-11-30 Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review Alexander, Peter Visagan, Shakthi Issa, Reem Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh Thomas, Sneha E Cureus Internal Medicine Anticoagulation therapy is the first line and drug of choice for both the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism). Anticoagulation drugs, ranging from different preparations of heparin, warfarin, and newer direct oral drugs such as rivaroxaban and dabigatran, work mainly by inhibiting important factors and enzymes in the coagulation cascade by preventing fibrin formation, platelet aggregation, and clot assembly. With recurrent thrombosis and embolisms being a feared complication for many physicians treating such cases, anticoagulation is often extended beyond the initial three- to six-month acute phase after an incident of venous thromboembolism. For some groups of patients, anticoagulation needs to be offered indefinitely to decrease the risk of a recurrent thrombosis. However, this concomitantly increases obvious and dangerous adverse effects such as increased risk of hemorrhage, as the ability to clot is hindered. This tradeoff between recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding is what underscores the controversy of the clinical question: for how long should anticoagulation be administered for venous thromboembolism? This review analyzes the use of anticoagulants in different types of venous thromboembolism and remarks on current consensus and trends on the length of anticoagulation treatment. We are doing so while acknowledging that venous thromboembolism management is an active area of research that is rapidly evolving. A literature search was performed looking at recent studies on anticoagulant administration for the treatment of venous thromboembolism with a focus on varying durations and patient populations. Factors that affect clinical decisions of duration are also elucidated. The most clinically relevant anticoagulants were discussed and their effects on the risk of recurrent thrombosis and embolism, and the risk of bleeding in relation to other drugs were analyzed. Ultimately, this article discussed patterns of anticoagulant treatments duration and which patient groups are likely to benefit the most from certain durations, shedding light on the ambiguity in how physicians should approach administering anticoagulation therapy over time for a broad range of presentations of venous thromboembolism. Cureus 2021-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8608253/ /pubmed/34853735 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18992 Text en Copyright © 2021, Alexander et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Alexander, Peter
Visagan, Shakthi
Issa, Reem
Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh
Thomas, Sneha E
Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_full Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_short Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_sort current trends in the duration of anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853735
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18992
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderpeter currenttrendsinthedurationofanticoagulanttherapyforvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT visaganshakthi currenttrendsinthedurationofanticoagulanttherapyforvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT issareem currenttrendsinthedurationofanticoagulanttherapyforvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT gorantlavasavirakesh currenttrendsinthedurationofanticoagulanttherapyforvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT thomassnehae currenttrendsinthedurationofanticoagulanttherapyforvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview