Cargando…

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study

BACKGROUND: To assess the completeness of reporting, research transparency practices, and risk of selection and immortal bias in observational studies using routinely collected data for comparative effectiveness research. METHOD: We performed a meta-research study by searching PubMed for comparative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nguyen, Van Thu, Engleton, Mishelle, Davison, Mauricia, Ravaud, Philippe, Porcher, Raphael, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02151-w

Ejemplares similares

Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective Intelligence
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
por: Oikonomidi, Theodora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
por: Naidoo, Nivantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
por: Barnes, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evidence for Treatment-by-Biomarker interaction for FDA-approved Oncology Drugs with Required Pharmacogenomic Biomarker Testing
por: Vivot, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Addressing the issue of bias in observational studies: Using instrumental variables and a quasi-randomization trial in an ESME research project
por: Ezzalfani, Monia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Course of post COVID-19 disease symptoms over time in the ComPaRe long COVID prospective e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reply: COVID-19 drug research and the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design
por: Porcher, Raphaël, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Patients’ Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent
por: Benchoufi, Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
por: Bertizzolo, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Trajectories of the evolution of post-COVID-19 condition, up to two years after symptoms onset
por: Servier, Clemence, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Differential Globalization of Industry- and Non-Industry–Sponsored Clinical Trials
por: Atal, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reporting Results of Orthopaedic Research: Confidence Intervals and p Values
por: Porcher, Raphaël
Publicado: (2009)

Randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket testing the effects of front-of-pack nutrition labelling on food purchasing intentions in a low-income population
por: Egnell, Manon, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of the Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition label on purchasing intentions of individuals with chronic diseases: results of a randomised trial
por: Egnell, Manon, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reducing bias in microbiome research: Comparing methods from sample collection to sequencing
por: Kool, Jolanda, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
por: Pibouleau, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6mhvcdgfrqjjqk5ibeuuinj2aj