Cargando…
Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study
OBJECTIVE: To develop a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future abortion randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted outcomes from quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of abortion studies to assess using a modified Delphi method. Via email, we invited resear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.004 |
_version_ | 1784602871320281088 |
---|---|
author | Whitehouse, Katherine C. Stifani, Bianca M. Duffy, James M.N. Kim, Caron R. Creinin, Mitchell D. DePiñeres, Teresa Winikoff, Beverly Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Blum, Jennifer Sherman, Renee Bracey Lavelanet, Antonella F. Brahmi, Dalia Grossman, Daniel Tamang, Anand Gebreselassie, Hailemichael Ponce de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ganatra, Bela |
author_facet | Whitehouse, Katherine C. Stifani, Bianca M. Duffy, James M.N. Kim, Caron R. Creinin, Mitchell D. DePiñeres, Teresa Winikoff, Beverly Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Blum, Jennifer Sherman, Renee Bracey Lavelanet, Antonella F. Brahmi, Dalia Grossman, Daniel Tamang, Anand Gebreselassie, Hailemichael Ponce de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ganatra, Bela |
author_sort | Whitehouse, Katherine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future abortion randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted outcomes from quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of abortion studies to assess using a modified Delphi method. Via email, we invited researchers, clinicians, patients, and healthcare organization representatives with expertise in abortion to rate the importance of the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. After 2 rounds, we used descriptive analyses to determine which outcomes met the predefined consensus criteria. We finalized the core outcome set during a series of consensus development meetings. RESULTS: We entered 42 outcomes, organized in 15 domains, into the Delphi survey. Two-hundred eighteen of 251 invitees (87%) provided responses (203 complete responses) for round 1 and 118 of 218 (42%) completed round2. Sixteen experts participated in the development meetings. The final outcome set includes 15 outcomes: 10 outcomes apply to all abortion trials (successful abortion, ongoing pregnancy, death, hemorrhage, uterine infection, hospitalization, surgical intervention, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patients’ experience of abortion); 2 outcomes apply to only surgical abortion trials (uterine perforation and cervical injury), one applies only to medical abortion trials (uterine rupture); and 2 apply to trials evaluating abortions with anesthesia (over-sedation/respiratory depression and local anesthetic systemic toxicity). CONCLUSION: Using robust consensus science methods we have developed a core outcome set for future abortion research. IMPLICATIONS: Standardized outcomes in abortion research could decrease heterogeneity among trials and improve the quality of systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. Researchers should select, collect, and report these core outcomes in future abortion trials. Journal editors should advocate for core outcome set reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8609158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86091582021-11-29 Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study Whitehouse, Katherine C. Stifani, Bianca M. Duffy, James M.N. Kim, Caron R. Creinin, Mitchell D. DePiñeres, Teresa Winikoff, Beverly Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Blum, Jennifer Sherman, Renee Bracey Lavelanet, Antonella F. Brahmi, Dalia Grossman, Daniel Tamang, Anand Gebreselassie, Hailemichael Ponce de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ganatra, Bela Contraception Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future abortion randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted outcomes from quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of abortion studies to assess using a modified Delphi method. Via email, we invited researchers, clinicians, patients, and healthcare organization representatives with expertise in abortion to rate the importance of the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. After 2 rounds, we used descriptive analyses to determine which outcomes met the predefined consensus criteria. We finalized the core outcome set during a series of consensus development meetings. RESULTS: We entered 42 outcomes, organized in 15 domains, into the Delphi survey. Two-hundred eighteen of 251 invitees (87%) provided responses (203 complete responses) for round 1 and 118 of 218 (42%) completed round2. Sixteen experts participated in the development meetings. The final outcome set includes 15 outcomes: 10 outcomes apply to all abortion trials (successful abortion, ongoing pregnancy, death, hemorrhage, uterine infection, hospitalization, surgical intervention, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patients’ experience of abortion); 2 outcomes apply to only surgical abortion trials (uterine perforation and cervical injury), one applies only to medical abortion trials (uterine rupture); and 2 apply to trials evaluating abortions with anesthesia (over-sedation/respiratory depression and local anesthetic systemic toxicity). CONCLUSION: Using robust consensus science methods we have developed a core outcome set for future abortion research. IMPLICATIONS: Standardized outcomes in abortion research could decrease heterogeneity among trials and improve the quality of systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. Researchers should select, collect, and report these core outcomes in future abortion trials. Journal editors should advocate for core outcome set reporting. Elsevier 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8609158/ /pubmed/34273335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.004 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Whitehouse, Katherine C. Stifani, Bianca M. Duffy, James M.N. Kim, Caron R. Creinin, Mitchell D. DePiñeres, Teresa Winikoff, Beverly Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Blum, Jennifer Sherman, Renee Bracey Lavelanet, Antonella F. Brahmi, Dalia Grossman, Daniel Tamang, Anand Gebreselassie, Hailemichael Ponce de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ganatra, Bela Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title | Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title_full | Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title_fullStr | Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title_short | Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study |
title_sort | standardizing abortion research outcomes (star): results from an international consensus development study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitehousekatherinec standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT stifanibiancam standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT duffyjamesmn standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT kimcaronr standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT creininmitchelld standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT depineresteresa standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT winikoffbeverly standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT gemzelldanielssonkristina standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT blumjennifer standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT shermanreneebracey standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT lavelanetantonellaf standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT brahmidalia standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT grossmandaniel standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT tamanganand standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT gebreselassiehailemichael standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT poncedeleonrodolfogomez standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy AT ganatrabela standardizingabortionresearchoutcomesstarresultsfromaninternationalconsensusdevelopmentstudy |