Cargando…

Combined Approach for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to classify the possible indications for a combined approach to distal radius fractures (DRFs) by investigating surgical outcomes of patients treated according to our treatment algorithm. METHODS: A combined approach was performed in 32 patients. Patients wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Hyoung-Seok, Cho, Hyung-Chul, Lee, Jae Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20291
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to classify the possible indications for a combined approach to distal radius fractures (DRFs) by investigating surgical outcomes of patients treated according to our treatment algorithm. METHODS: A combined approach was performed in 32 patients. Patients who were thought to need a combined approach were classified into three types according to the combined injuries associated with loss of volar cortical buttresses in DRFs. The classifications included the following: type 1, free intra-articular fragments; type 2, distally migrated dorsal fragments located beyond the wrist joint; and type 3, centrally impacted articular fragments and displaced dorsal fragments, not reduced by indirect methods. RESULTS: Seven patients had type 1 fractures treated with volar plates and excision of the intra-articular fragments. Fourteen patients had type 2 fractures: 12 were treated with volar plates and excision of dorsal fragments, and 2 with relatively large unstable dorsal fragments were treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. The remaining 11 patients had type 3 fractures treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. At the latest follow-up, the radiographs revealed an average of 16.9° of radial inclination, an average of 4.2° of volar tilt, and an average of 7.5 mm of radial height. According to the Garland and Werley scores, the functional results were excellent for 3 patients, good for 25, and fair for 4. CONCLUSIONS: The classification system indicated when an additional dorsal approach was needed in unstable DRFs, and it may establish useful guidelines for appropriate surgical decision-making.