Cargando…

Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis

OBJECTIVES: Motivation for return to work (RTW) reflects the degree of willingness to resume work activities and has been shown to be a crucial factor in long‐term work disability. The satisfaction of basic psychological needs and motivation as described by the Self‐Determination Theory (SDT) yield...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanovenberghe, Charlotte, Du Bois, Marc, Lauwerier, Emelien, Van den Broeck, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12284
_version_ 1784602922710990848
author Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Du Bois, Marc
Lauwerier, Emelien
Van den Broeck, Anja
author_facet Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Du Bois, Marc
Lauwerier, Emelien
Van den Broeck, Anja
author_sort Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Motivation for return to work (RTW) reflects the degree of willingness to resume work activities and has been shown to be a crucial factor in long‐term work disability. The satisfaction of basic psychological needs and motivation as described by the Self‐Determination Theory (SDT) yield associations with outcomes such as quality of life and job satisfaction. The current study is the first study to examine whether motivation and basic psychological needs are predictive for RTW outcomes at 1‐year follow‐up. METHODS: About 349 people with a work disability (mean = 131.32 days off work) participated in this observational longitudinal research. Quality of motivation (MAWS) and basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration (BPNSFS) were measured at baseline. At 12‐month follow‐up, differences in RTW were assessed in terms of (1) time until RTW, (2) partial RTW, (3) relapse within 12 months, (4) work disability longer than 12 months. Binary logistic and cox regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Controlled motivation regarding the former job was related to shorter time until RTW. Autonomous motivation and amotivation did not seem predictive for RTW variables. The frustration of the basic needs was related to a longer work disability, need satisfaction was not related to the RTW variables. No significant predictors for relapse and partial RTW were found. CONCLUSIONS: The frustration of basic psychological needs was predictive for a longer work disability. Controlled motivation on the other hand predicted faster RTW, which was an unexpected direction. SDT seems to have predictive value, yet underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8609417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86094172021-11-29 Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Du Bois, Marc Lauwerier, Emelien Van den Broeck, Anja J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Motivation for return to work (RTW) reflects the degree of willingness to resume work activities and has been shown to be a crucial factor in long‐term work disability. The satisfaction of basic psychological needs and motivation as described by the Self‐Determination Theory (SDT) yield associations with outcomes such as quality of life and job satisfaction. The current study is the first study to examine whether motivation and basic psychological needs are predictive for RTW outcomes at 1‐year follow‐up. METHODS: About 349 people with a work disability (mean = 131.32 days off work) participated in this observational longitudinal research. Quality of motivation (MAWS) and basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration (BPNSFS) were measured at baseline. At 12‐month follow‐up, differences in RTW were assessed in terms of (1) time until RTW, (2) partial RTW, (3) relapse within 12 months, (4) work disability longer than 12 months. Binary logistic and cox regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Controlled motivation regarding the former job was related to shorter time until RTW. Autonomous motivation and amotivation did not seem predictive for RTW variables. The frustration of the basic needs was related to a longer work disability, need satisfaction was not related to the RTW variables. No significant predictors for relapse and partial RTW were found. CONCLUSIONS: The frustration of basic psychological needs was predictive for a longer work disability. Controlled motivation on the other hand predicted faster RTW, which was an unexpected direction. SDT seems to have predictive value, yet underlying mechanisms remain unclear. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8609417/ /pubmed/34811863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12284 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Du Bois, Marc
Lauwerier, Emelien
Van den Broeck, Anja
Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title_full Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title_fullStr Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title_short Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis
title_sort does motivation predict return to work? a longitudinal analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12284
work_keys_str_mv AT vanovenberghecharlotte doesmotivationpredictreturntoworkalongitudinalanalysis
AT duboismarc doesmotivationpredictreturntoworkalongitudinalanalysis
AT lauwerieremelien doesmotivationpredictreturntoworkalongitudinalanalysis
AT vandenbroeckanja doesmotivationpredictreturntoworkalongitudinalanalysis