Cargando…
Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Individual-patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is an increasingly popular approach because of its analytical benefits. IPD-MA of observational studies must overcome the problem of confounding, otherwise biased estimates of treatment effect may be obtained. One approach to reducing confou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01452-1 |
_version_ | 1784602972156592128 |
---|---|
author | Johara, Fatema Tuj Benedetti, Andrea Platt, Robert Menzies, Dick Viiklepp, Piret Schaaf, Simon Chan, Edward |
author_facet | Johara, Fatema Tuj Benedetti, Andrea Platt, Robert Menzies, Dick Viiklepp, Piret Schaaf, Simon Chan, Edward |
author_sort | Johara, Fatema Tuj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individual-patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is an increasingly popular approach because of its analytical benefits. IPD-MA of observational studies must overcome the problem of confounding, otherwise biased estimates of treatment effect may be obtained. One approach to reducing confounding bias could be the use of propensity score matching (PSM). IPD-MA can be considered as two-stage clustered data (patients within studies) and propensity score matching can be implemented within studies, across studies, and combining both. METHODS: This article focuses on implementation of four PSM-based approaches for the analysis of data structure that exploit IPD-MA in two ways: (i) estimation of propensity score model using single-level or random-effects logistic regression; and (ii) matching of propensity scores (PS) across studies, within studies or preferential-within studies. We investigated the performance of these approaches through a simulation study, which considers an IPD-MA that examined the success of different treatments for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The simulation parameters were varied according to three treatment prevalences (according to studies, 50% and 30%), three levels of heterogeneity between studies (low, moderate and high) and three levels of pooled odds ratio (1, 1.5, 3). RESULTS: All approaches showed greater biases at the higher levels of heterogeneity regardless of the choices of treatment prevalences. However, matching of propensity scores using within-study and preferential-within study reported better performance compared to matching across studies when treatment prevalence varied across-studies. For fixed prevalences, a random-effect propensity score model to estimate propensity scores followed by matching of propensity scores across-studies achieved lower biases compared to other PSM-based approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity score matching has wide application in health research while only limited literature is available on the implementation of PSM methods in IPD-MA, and until now methodological performance of PSM methods have not been examined. We believe, this work offers an intuition to the applied researcher for the choice of the PSM-based approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8609730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86097302021-11-23 Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis Johara, Fatema Tuj Benedetti, Andrea Platt, Robert Menzies, Dick Viiklepp, Piret Schaaf, Simon Chan, Edward BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Individual-patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is an increasingly popular approach because of its analytical benefits. IPD-MA of observational studies must overcome the problem of confounding, otherwise biased estimates of treatment effect may be obtained. One approach to reducing confounding bias could be the use of propensity score matching (PSM). IPD-MA can be considered as two-stage clustered data (patients within studies) and propensity score matching can be implemented within studies, across studies, and combining both. METHODS: This article focuses on implementation of four PSM-based approaches for the analysis of data structure that exploit IPD-MA in two ways: (i) estimation of propensity score model using single-level or random-effects logistic regression; and (ii) matching of propensity scores (PS) across studies, within studies or preferential-within studies. We investigated the performance of these approaches through a simulation study, which considers an IPD-MA that examined the success of different treatments for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The simulation parameters were varied according to three treatment prevalences (according to studies, 50% and 30%), three levels of heterogeneity between studies (low, moderate and high) and three levels of pooled odds ratio (1, 1.5, 3). RESULTS: All approaches showed greater biases at the higher levels of heterogeneity regardless of the choices of treatment prevalences. However, matching of propensity scores using within-study and preferential-within study reported better performance compared to matching across studies when treatment prevalence varied across-studies. For fixed prevalences, a random-effect propensity score model to estimate propensity scores followed by matching of propensity scores across-studies achieved lower biases compared to other PSM-based approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity score matching has wide application in health research while only limited literature is available on the implementation of PSM methods in IPD-MA, and until now methodological performance of PSM methods have not been examined. We believe, this work offers an intuition to the applied researcher for the choice of the PSM-based approaches. BioMed Central 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8609730/ /pubmed/34814845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01452-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Johara, Fatema Tuj Benedetti, Andrea Platt, Robert Menzies, Dick Viiklepp, Piret Schaaf, Simon Chan, Edward Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title | Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01452-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joharafatematuj evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT benedettiandrea evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT plattrobert evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT menziesdick evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT viiklepppiret evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT schaafsimon evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT chanedward evaluatingtheperformanceofpropensityscorematchingbasedapproachesinindividualpatientdatametaanalysis |