Cargando…
Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements
BACKGROUND: Inadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04834-0 |
_version_ | 1784602975129305088 |
---|---|
author | Hennings, Robert Souleiman, Firas Heilemann, Martin Hennings, Mareike Klengel, Alexis Osterhoff, Georg Hepp, Pierre Ahrberg, Annette B. |
author_facet | Hennings, Robert Souleiman, Firas Heilemann, Martin Hennings, Mareike Klengel, Alexis Osterhoff, Georg Hepp, Pierre Ahrberg, Annette B. |
author_sort | Hennings, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, patients with unilateral stabilization of an ankle fracture with a syndesmotic injury and post-operative bilateral CT scans were analyzed using a recently established 3D method. The side-to-side differences were compared for tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS), translation angle (∆α), and vertical offset (∆z) among patients stabilized with syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Syndesmotic malreduction was defined for ∆CS > 2 mm and for |∆α| > 5°. ∆CS and ∆α were correlated with two-dimensional (2D) measurements. RESULTS: Eighteen patients stabilized with a syndesmosis screw and 29 stabilized with a suture button system were analyzed. After stabilization, both groups revealed mild diastasis (SYS: mean ∆CS 0.3 mm, SD 1.1 mm vs SBS: mean ∆CS 0.2 mm, SD 1.2 mm, p = 0.710). In addition, both stabilization methods showed slight dorsalization of the fibula (SYS: mean ∆α 0.5°, SD 4.6° vs SBS: mean ∆α 2.1°, SD 3.7°, p = 0.192). Also, restoration of the fibula-to-tibia length ratio also did not differ between the two groups (SYS: mean Δz of 0.5 mm, SD 2.4 mm vs SBS: mean Δz of 0 mm, SD 1.2 mm; p = 0.477). Malreduction according to high ∆α was most common (26% of cases), with equal distribution between the groups (p = 0.234). ∆CS and ∆α showed good correlation with 2D measurements (ρ = 0.567; ρ = 0.671). CONCLUSION: This in vivo analysis of post-operative 3D models showed no differences in immediate post-operative alignment after syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Special attention should be paid to syndesmotic malreduction in the sagittal orientation of the fibula in relation to the tibia in radiological control of the syndesmotic congruity as well as intra-operatively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8609744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86097442021-11-23 Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements Hennings, Robert Souleiman, Firas Heilemann, Martin Hennings, Mareike Klengel, Alexis Osterhoff, Georg Hepp, Pierre Ahrberg, Annette B. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Inadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, patients with unilateral stabilization of an ankle fracture with a syndesmotic injury and post-operative bilateral CT scans were analyzed using a recently established 3D method. The side-to-side differences were compared for tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS), translation angle (∆α), and vertical offset (∆z) among patients stabilized with syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Syndesmotic malreduction was defined for ∆CS > 2 mm and for |∆α| > 5°. ∆CS and ∆α were correlated with two-dimensional (2D) measurements. RESULTS: Eighteen patients stabilized with a syndesmosis screw and 29 stabilized with a suture button system were analyzed. After stabilization, both groups revealed mild diastasis (SYS: mean ∆CS 0.3 mm, SD 1.1 mm vs SBS: mean ∆CS 0.2 mm, SD 1.2 mm, p = 0.710). In addition, both stabilization methods showed slight dorsalization of the fibula (SYS: mean ∆α 0.5°, SD 4.6° vs SBS: mean ∆α 2.1°, SD 3.7°, p = 0.192). Also, restoration of the fibula-to-tibia length ratio also did not differ between the two groups (SYS: mean Δz of 0.5 mm, SD 2.4 mm vs SBS: mean Δz of 0 mm, SD 1.2 mm; p = 0.477). Malreduction according to high ∆α was most common (26% of cases), with equal distribution between the groups (p = 0.234). ∆CS and ∆α showed good correlation with 2D measurements (ρ = 0.567; ρ = 0.671). CONCLUSION: This in vivo analysis of post-operative 3D models showed no differences in immediate post-operative alignment after syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Special attention should be paid to syndesmotic malreduction in the sagittal orientation of the fibula in relation to the tibia in radiological control of the syndesmotic congruity as well as intra-operatively. BioMed Central 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8609744/ /pubmed/34809628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04834-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hennings, Robert Souleiman, Firas Heilemann, Martin Hennings, Mareike Klengel, Alexis Osterhoff, Georg Hepp, Pierre Ahrberg, Annette B. Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title | Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title_full | Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title_fullStr | Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title_short | Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements |
title_sort | suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3d imaging-based measurements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04834-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henningsrobert suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT souleimanfiras suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT heilemannmartin suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT henningsmareike suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT klengelalexis suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT osterhoffgeorg suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT hepppierre suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements AT ahrbergannetteb suturebuttonversussyndesmoticscrewinanklefracturesevaluationwith3dimagingbasedmeasurements |